>>1104150

I could have swore he tweeted that a few days ago.

>>1104343

Thx.

Notice that he changed the number of years.

And wasn't there something suggesting relevance when POTUS duplicates tweet?

>>1104450

>>1104397

>>1104343

If 39% not complete, it took 432 days (between 1/20/17 and 4/2/18) to complete 61%. So the 7 years would not be accurate.

And it increased by two years in current tweet.

>>1104620

Yes. That's what I calculated.

That means he purposely suggested 7 years to exaggerate and is now adding to it.

>>1104343

"…work for our Government, hence, the American People."

Hence the AP?

>>1104620

>>1104632

a communication…

7 to 9 years