>>11045954, >>11047486, >>11035622
Productive review of the significance of the lights on the MILLBANK building in background of EMBANKMENT pics. Also very gud connexion described between that pattern of lights and the tidal info evident within the camera frames.
Anons please confirm and/or correct the following.
-
In these pics the TATT and HISP appeared to be closed. The main lights of the interiors and decks were off. The TATT's gangplanks were left in the dark.There appeared to be no one on decj nor on gangplanks/ramps.
-
In LISAMI6, the MILLBANK office building's lights were lit up in a pattern that repeated in ROT2. The night sky was very dark and so the scene appeared to be late night in both pics.
-
Pedestrians were on crosswalk in junction in both ROT1 and ROT2.
-
Items 1 and 2 served to closely connect LisaMI6, ROT1, and ROT2 chronologically.
-
The tide in ROT1 was a high tide. The ROT1 scene could have been taken within a couple of hours of the tide level in LisaMI6.
This high would have been the only night high tide that day. This coincided with a particular pattern of night lights on in the upper floors of MILLBANK.
Might the same pattern of lights have been repeated just so on another night? What are the odds such a detail would have occured randomly, if at all? Low.
The scene captured in LisaMI6 was taken as a high tide rolled in. That means late night - prolly after hours on the TATT and HISP and after typical business hours at MILLBANK - and it means the pics were taken on the same night.
A consequence of this pictorial evidence is that the EMB pics share the same time range and the same timeline. Date one of the pics and you will have dated the others as well.
Reosted this here to round-out the discussion from previous bread and to set stage for continuation of that topic.