But what is the end game here?
I see masses and masses of research but to what end?
It's like an autistic dog has got hold of a fossilsed bone and refuses to give it up even though it's breaking its teeth.
But what is the end game here?
I see masses and masses of research but to what end?
It's like an autistic dog has got hold of a fossilsed bone and refuses to give it up even though it's breaking its teeth.
>they have only one game, to slide the bread, DIVERSION
I would like to disagree with you, but I really can't see any other purpose of such an intensive and elaborate dig on the Corinthian; there really isn't any pay off at all..
>Q directly drew attention to The Corinthia Hotel. What do you think might be the pay off, if anything, for Q having done so?
I would think that Q was alerting us to the bad actors involved and a rough time line of how long they have been under observation as well as what places in close proximity would be of interest to us.
Narrowing things down to an exact time frame doesn't appear to pay any dividends as far as I can see.
Do you have an alternative answer?
>The hotel, fren, what is the pay-off for drawing attention to that?
Ah. that has yielded a vast spider web of connections to a multitude of bad actors.
>What then is that rough time line and who was under observation?
I admit I have not followed the digs, but from what I recall of what I have seen, it's either late 2013 or early 2014 (I may be wrong and I'm happy to admit my ignorance).
As for who has been under observation, well, this is the UK and everybody in the entire country (barring those that live in the most remote locations such as myself and even then I'm not so sure of that with the swarm of satellites buzzing above our heads with who knows what gadgetry on board) is under constant surveillance and that includes all the CIA niggers and assorted bad actors. As Q said, they really do have it all. Thanks FVEYS.