Apparently, Q is going to start dropping Gina's more complete bio per latest drop.
Her posted bio would seem to indicate she was given a government language learning course thereby qualifying her to be made "Central Eurasian" station chief. Would the Central Eurasian station be near Moscow?
Our little sparrow Gina has more history going back to early 90s, and maybe further.
While we have made great progress even in this bread on London pics aided by just the new eyes here recently (o7 to our new eyes anons who have helped with EMB and PC. Gud werk!), would love to see ALL EYES ON. We make progress each week and are closer and closer, and I would love to see UK thread solve this on our own, but while this dig for a long time has been our own, it does not belong to us. I say share it, as is, in General. Perhaps at the end of each vid, include a detailed request to dig for certain info we need. Our goals remain fundamentally the solving the London drops. New eyes, as has recently occurred, can really accelerate these digs toward completion.
On an unrelated matter, I note green leaves in that 2013 cap above, >>1125218, and as Anon has also stated, some years may have warmer weather in Winter, allowing for a later leaf drop. Am still mindful of the bare trees in CH pics. Still poss some of the CH pics are diff dates? Poss documentation of recurring meetings?
I agree. Nightshift is comfy and Q posts there often near midnight EST(USA). Can re-post for Dayshift after. I like the time when the morning baker just arrives too.
>The pics Q dropped may or may not have been taken by good actors. So the question, who, depends on the osbersver perhaps as much, right? Q used the pics, but did Q record or snap the pics? May not matter to anons but perhaps this provided a form of comms with other actors, good and bad.
Have thot about this a lot in regards to the London pics. If there is the slightest possibility that the images could have caught good actors just doing their job surveilling targets within their own country, I imagine Q should understand that it is bad form to document security services in the performance of their legitimate duties. Very bad form. In some of the photos, you get the impression that some of the subjects might be following other subjects. One would hope that a security agency wouldn't cross the line and show persons of another security service doing a job they were tasked to do by their superiors. Doing such a thing for the sole purpose of edifying some anons on the Chans seems not a worthy endeavor. So one hopes that the Q content editors would have considered this most compelling reason not to doxx innocent actors. Should we just assume all persons in pics are therefore bad actors worthy of the doxx? This has been one of the reasons I've thot that, if Q was sending a warning with a fuzzy image of a neutral actor doing their job, perhaps to leverage them, we may never see further acknowledgment of the pic if "good agents" responded.
Ever wonder how Q might make sure those "good agents" knew to look here to see Q comms for them to respond? Say you were a "normie" gray-hat who never heard of Q. You'd have to be "contacted" somehow, and either to see Q's comm for you here on the Chans. Or maybe you were never told to look on the chans at all. Some would report an attempted contact, some not? If any grayhats were contacted, what would be the need to do comms here? Unless…, all the chatter going on here is intentional static, Q's version of game comms. We provide the chatter while Q comms happen before our very eyes. Are shills really shills? Those regular posting shills who post every day. Perhaps those seemingly repetitive posts have variations, like a the old tape in a window. Yesterday it was at a right-to-left diagonal. Today it goes left-to-right. Ever wonder about why those shills were so religiously persistent about being at the top of each bread? 'Member hearing anons being chided not to "sh-t" the bread? Stay away from that part of the bread. Why is it "out of bounds"? Has Q ever used that first bread? How often? Some thots late in "the game". Better than calling someone a shill I guess.
I would lean toward last stubborn leaves on the trees. See what could be some yellow and brown leaves as well. Do take notice of the lawns. See those perfectly manicured dark areas? Those are where the annual flowers are planted (when in season). I never commented on those beds previously seen in other vids as, I seem to say this more and more, I did not think it worthy of note (at the time.) In any event, the annual flower beds are left bare. After the growing season, and before the growing season for annuals.
It could. Previously we were looking at BMW B7 Xseries. Btw, the middle car at the EMB traffic cam appears to have a BMW grille such as a B7 might have at the time. Not an inexpensive car.
You seem to have stated the current state of the EMB dig nicely.
In a kind of unrelated aside, but yet relevant as a useful comparison, I looked at some caps from the recently posted St. Patrick's Day vid.
Some observations:
Notice the direction of the shadows (people, signposts, traffic lights) all point almost directly North and parallel to Victoria Embankment. Using the free website, suncalc.org, After setting it to March 17, 2014, I was able to line up the Sun with Victoria Embankment so that shadows would be cast parallel to VE Road. After lining this up, a look at the clock showed the time to be around 1:30pm. This would be about an hour away from that afternoon's high tide of 7.14 meters which occurred at 2:26pm that day. Anons will recall the cap from this vid shows the Hispaniola to be at a pretty high position in relation to her mooring, very near what we see in Q's ROT1 pic.
Do anons realize that the Corinthia Hotel is owned by a MALTESE consortium? See that flag they fly at the entrance on Whitehall Place? It's a Maltese flag. Hospitaliers? Maltese professors named Mifsud. Any chance there is a connection with people from Malta who own expensive hotels and the name MIFSUD?