>but look what showed up in the discounted items for Prime Day list.
>There's Q's clock!
^^^^^^^^^^^NOTABLE….mickey mouse clock on AMAZON PRIME SPECIAL for TODAY
STAND STRONG, GINA.
Q
3022
10-Mar-2019 11:27:15 PM CDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
8ch/qresearch
Archived links:
1
>>5617724
Connect the dots?
@Snowden released code words (NSA_key(s)).
@Snowden travels to RUSSIA.
Shadow Brokers release actual code (NSA_key(s)).
Shadow Brokers ORIG in RUSSIA.
Can you make the connection why @Snowden went to RUSSIA?
Can you make the connection who provided the source code to SHADOW BROKERS?
Define 'Spook'.
Define 'Shadow'.
Do 'Spooks' hide in the 'Shadows'?
STAND STRONG, GINA.
Q
Sen SheDon WhiteASS is up
>So basically the only good thing Obama did while in office, killing bin laden, was all bullshit.
GM is alive
Bin Laden is DEAD
https://twitter.com/onewalleee/status/1316057748723859459
One Walleee
@onewalleee
·
11m
^ … everything up to [a] & [b] are explosive but I suppose potentially believable
But:
a - as far as I know it's false that ALL of the SEAL Team 6 operators involved in Neptune Spear were killed, why let some live?
b - what?! Why would Iran funnel the money back?
/2
One Walleee
@onewalleee
Replying to
@onewalleee
@Caleidoscope11
and 3 others
I thought they were implying that the SEAL Team 6 operators who died were killed off in a Chinook later in 2011, but it sounds like they are saying it happened during Neptune Spear "it was a one way trip", "Pakistan radars were turned back on"..
/3
NEVER FORGET: Families Blame 'Loose Lips Joe Biden' After Taliban Slaughters 16 Members of SEAL…
The liberal mainstream media said NOTHING back in 2011 when loose-lips Joe Biden outed SEAL Team 6 as the heroes of the Osama Bin Laden raid in Pakistan. 16 members of SEAL Team 6 were slaughtered by…
thegatewaypundit.com
11:46 AM · Oct 13, 2020
DONORS TRUST??
What is the left using, if right has Donors Trust?
>Exclusive: Coup Plotters Considered Never Allowing Trump To Be Inaugurated
notable^^^^
in the wake of Donald Trump’s “surprise” victory in November 2016, a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) was rushed through pushing the false Russian collusion narrative and asserting as the judgment of the Intelligence Community as a whole that the Russians had not only interfered in the election but had done so in order to assist Donald Trump and help him become President. We have known for some time that this NIE was drafted, what we now know is considerably more about the highly unusual way in which it was drafted.
https://twitter.com/DavidAsmanfox/status/1316062130404237312
David Asman
@DavidAsmanfox
If Sen. Whitehouse is so concerned about dark-money ties to judicial affairs, how about HIS ties to Arabella Advisors, a for-profit entity that manages nonprofits that support progressive groups and their judicial projects??? See WSJ reports…
Questions for Senator Whitehouse
A chance to ask the Democrat about his ties to ‘dark money.’
By The Editorial Board
Sept. 21, 2020 7:03
https://www.wsj.com/articles/questions-for-senator-whitehouse-11600729418
>Questions for Senator Whitehouse
>A chance to ask the Democrat about his ties to ‘dark money.’
>By The Editorial Board
>Sept. 21, 2020 7:03
They can start by asking about Arabella Advisors. This for-profit entity manages nonprofits including the Sixteen Thirty Fund and the New Venture Fund that support progressive groups and projects. Together the two reported more than $987.5 million in revenue in 2017 and 2018, mostly from contributions and grants, according to their most recent public disclosures. That’s a lot of political cash. As nonprofits, they need not disclose their donors or most vendors, so the money trail goes dark.
Republicans can also ask Mr. Whitehouse about his ties to Demand Justice, which describes itself as a “project” of the Sixteen Thirty Fund and New Venture Fund. In 2018 it spent some $5 million opposing Brett Kavanaugh, and it’s gearing up for the next Supreme Court fight. Demand Justice wants Democrats to pack the Supreme Court “to balance out Trump’s ideologically extreme, illegitimate picks.”
When a Daily Caller reporter asked Mr. Whitehouse last year if Demand Justice and groups like it have donated to his campaign, the Senator replied, “hope so.” So has he received money from Demand Justice and other Arabella affiliates? Has he collaborated with them to block President Trump’s judicial nominees?
Mr. Whitehouse is also leading a political assault on the Federalist Society, the network of lawyers and students that sponsors legal conferences. The conspiracy-minded Senator says the group “is at the center of a network of dark-money-funded conservative organizations whose purpose is to influence court composition and outcomes.” Sounds nefarious. But unlike Mr. Whitehouse, the Federalist Society files no amicus briefs with the Supreme Court. And unlike Demand Justice, it doesn’t endorse or oppose judicial nominees.
Another question is what role Arabella’s affiliates played in a failed attempt this year by a committee of the U.S. Judicial Conference to ban federal judges from belonging to the Federalist Society. Did Mr. Whitehouse discuss such a ban with his longtime ally John McConnell, the federal judge who sat on the committee that drafted proposed revisions to the judicial Codes of Conduct? The revisions were scuttled after a judicial uproar.
Curious minds may also wonder if any group that directly or indirectly receives funding from Arabella has paid for the briefs Mr. Whitehouse has filed at the Supreme Court. One of those briefs threatened the Court with being “restructured” if it didn’t rule the way he and four Senate colleagues demanded. Mr. Whitehouse has pushed for donor disclosure by entities whose political advocacy focuses on the judiciary, so should Demand Justice and other Arabella affiliates have to disclose their donors?
Mr. Whitehouse is trying to stifle the donations and speech of his political opponents. The least he can do is set an example by disclosing his own dark-money network and its plans to undermine judicial independence.
> Sixteen Thirty Fund and the New Venture Fund that support progressive groups and projects. Together the two reported more than $987.5 million in revenue in 2017 and 2018, mostly from contributions and grants, according to their most recent public disclosures. That’s a lot of political cash. As nonprofits, they need not disclose their donors or most vendors, so the money trail goes dark.
Sixteen Thirty Fund
The “green wave” of campaign cash that boosted Democrats and liberal causes in 2018 included an unprecedented gusher of secret money, new documents obtained by POLITICO show.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund, a little-known nonprofit headquartered in Washington, spent $141 million on more than 100 left-leaning causes during the midterm election year, according to a new tax filing from the group. The money contributed to efforts ranging from fighting Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and other Trump judicial nominees to boosting ballot measures raising the minimum wage and changing laws on voting and redistricting in numerous states.
The group's 2018 fundraising surpassed any amount ever raised by a left-leaning political nonprofit, according to experts, who pointed to the Koch network and the Crossroads network as rare right-leaning groups that posted bigger yearly fundraising totals at the height of their powers.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund’s rise last year is a sign that Democrats and allies have embraced the methods of groups they decried as “dark money” earlier this decade, when they were under attack from the money machines built by conservatives including the Kochs.
“In terms of the size of dark money networks, there are only a few that have gone into the $100 million-plus range,” said Robert Maguire, the research director for the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and an expert in political nonprofits.
“These kinds of totals aren’t unheard of,” Maguire added. “I do think they’re unheard of on the liberal side. I think that’s what’s so striking about this.”
In an email, Sixteen Thirty Fund executive director Amy Kurtz wrote that the group “provides support to advocates and social welfare organizations around the country, and we are pleased with the growth we had in 2018.”
Sixteen Thirty Fund played a role in the battle for the House of Representatives in 2018, a crucial contest for Democrats trying to seize back power after Trump’s rise. The election featured dozens of Democratic candidates who decried the influence of money in politics on the campaign trail………
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/dark-money-democrats-midterm-071725
>Questions for Senator Whitehouse
>A chance to ask the Democrat about his ties to ‘dark money.’
TED CRUZ lurks here or on same wavelength
>Whitehouse was at NoName's Sedona Institute
that was all photoshopped….now we know why.
notable^^^^based Marsha Blackburn
anons,
we need to dig on White house.
Cruz went after him on Dark Money
and now Marsha, Marsha, Marsha
what is he hiding…ties to noname?
what else?
>"ST6 was eliminated because too many of them knew the truth about the fake OBL raid and could not/ would not repeat the same story"
>Regardless, the above is much more damaging.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
no shit!
what a absolutely dumb shill, to say all they did was…………..