>>11051950 (pb)
someone responded to The President, and the shills are saying it was a retweet?
>>11051950 (pb)
someone responded to The President, and the shills are saying it was a retweet?
so now that it's been established that it was a retweet,
why is it so important 23 hours later?
why didn't it show up yesterday?
and does it mean that the president agrees (no) but that it's just worth considering?
all of that is unclear.
I stand by the contention that all of this attention to this topic is a slide.