Anonymous ID: 0d1fc1 Oct. 13, 2020, 3:56 p.m. No.11057119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7206

>>11056936 lb

>ITS OVER. WE FUCKING LOST

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1316144251252555776?s=20

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barr-unmasking-review-no-charges/2020/10/13/0f63fd2e-0d67-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html#click=https://t.co/rixl2ktkrr

 

you faggots should learn to read past a fucking WAPO headline before you have an emotional meltdown on the internet.

 

The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department. The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the “unmasking” of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.

 

the investigation finished. no indictments because its a part of russiagate, which durham is investigating. john bash collected the evidence of the unmasking and gave it to durham to use. DOJ refuses to release results (being used as evidence) but "people familiar with the…bla bla bla"

Anonymous ID: 0d1fc1 Oct. 13, 2020, 4:05 p.m. No.11057232   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7267

>>11057122

>>11057169

>qanon.pub was changing words in drops

no they werent.

they're the same post anon. just formatted differently. Q quoted an anon. but the operation Q cap also included the Q post that the anon was responding to. 4211