Is Schiff attempting the Smear and wrap up tactic on Qanons?
kek. that one image could be obama!
Larry Sinclair
Obama cheated on Michael withLarry Sinclair
who has Big Mike cheated with?
good night fren
I remember watching his press conference.
he seemed legit back then and he does now, too.
>Larry Sinclair
Larry Sinclair press conference 2008
it would be nice to get his name trending along with Dinesh's video
>it would be nice to get his name trending along with Dinesh's video
https://twitter.com/PratushSayan/status/1315677117133152258
larry sinclair clip on twitter
https://twitter.com/scottadamsshow/status/1315934991075942406
i was more taken by obama's cheezy smile
>It's legitimately depressing how much traction that Parrot character is gaining here.
it's depressing to see anons like you questioning this stuff after Trump has retweeted Parrot
Larry Sinclair is still alive and was in the new Dinesh movie.
what larry are you talking about?
Obama bin lyin
Chriss afraido Cuomo has a mustache now?
And a scrubby beard.
None of them are sleeping or grooming themselves.
we are seeing Panic live on TV.
don't know what point you are making unless you think the DS has control over his twitter.
so you think Trump's twitter is controlled by the DS.
Why would he retweet the Noes guy, too, then?
do you think overeating is any worse than other faults people have?
it's just one of the most obvious faults
I am not really sure what his name is.
but trump retweeted this guy, too.
https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1315739170720145414
thanks.
the point I was making to the other anon is that Trump has retweeted two different twats related to BenghaziโฆParrot and Noe.
so how can there be any doubt there is something to these whistleblowers?
okay, got it.
>Well, that's the thing, do we know that Trump signed off on that tweet?
There is a Q drop which says that every word and every tweet has meaning.
I consider this a Trump tweetโฆ.so it has meaning.
Q has also said that Trump does not say anything that is not true.
So put those two together.
>POTUS has RTโd some pretty wild shit in the past so that doesnโt make it anything.
see >>11062332
> You will not succeed.
succeed at what?
I have a lot of post because I am answering you.
>he wouldn't be retweeting something unfounded.
^^^^^^^^^^^^this
he retweeted two whistleblowers.