>>11030077 (pb/Q)

Anons have no reason to be afraid of exposure on Twttr unless they're in a position where they're risking their livelihood or worse. It's easy to be supportive of others, no need to get deep into popularity contests, don't even bother with trying to be a leader because POTUS is CiC already and he's all the leader anyone needs. Not trying so hard to use camouflage might even keep Anons off the enemy's radar when the tweets are casual and honest, but trying to build a big following while at the same time as trying to hide from the admins is like trying to paint polkadots on an exploding hand grenade while thinking they're stupid enough to mistake that for an Easter egg. Why would you instruct Anons to do that, Q?