BAKER/KITCHEN WARS
This is what I thought of when I read this Newsweek article that had been previously notable'd
"Because QAnon is so decentralized, going after individual members is "like trying to find the molecule in a pot of water that's made the water boil," Johnson says. What matters is the behavior of the collective, which is a strength of QAnon and other conspiracy-theory movements. But it's a strength that could be turned into a line of attack. When water is close to boiling, small bubbles form along the sides and bottom of a pot. By breaking up those bubbles—perhaps a hundred to a pot—it's possible to prevent water from boiling. Likewise, an effective strategy to contain QAnon might be to target specific small clusters of QAnon members whose behaviors are closely influencing one another, and whose activity threatens to trigger potentially more dangerous behavior in the larger community.
How exactly to break up QAnon "bubbles" is a subject of Johnson's current research. QAnon members in a cluster tend to focus in on their shared attitudes toward certain things they think are happening the world, whether it's particular elements of a conspiracy theory, or certain recent news events. At the same time, they tend to ignore topics they may disagree on, be it religion, politics, health, or others. That may create an opportunity to drive a wedge between these members. "If we can call attention to the points of possible disagreement, we may be able to pull them apart so that their behavior becomes less correlated," says Johnson. "It's basically the opposite of conflict resolution."
Other research suggests that if you change the opinions of a third of a community, the rest of the community is likely to follow. By sowing discord in the right clusters of members, it might be possible to bring QAnon down."
https://www.newsweek.com/2020/10/23/qanon-conspiracy-theories-draw-new-believers-scientists-take-aim-misinformation-pandemic-1538901.html
We've seen conflicts with/between bakers before, but this is, to me, clearly an attempt to break up the "mother bubble" - the place where Q posts and those who make the threads in which Q posts.
Unnatural
Unnecessary
Obsessive
Neurotic
Insistent and persistent
Divisive
Annoying/irritating
Polarizing (break anons into opposing camps)
Totally the opposite of what Q tells us:
>Together we WIN
>Unity
>They want you divided
>Patriots stand together
Does anyone else see this?
(no I'm not a baker)