Anonymous ID: 59de0d Oct. 14, 2020, 11:18 p.m. No.11080209   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0343 >>0645 >>0651 >>0854

>>11080103

tyb

especially for getting the title right!

Rudy Giuliani Interrupted His Effort to Smear Joe Biden With An Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theory About George Soros

 

I believe Soros works for P and that P = papacy and also that Rudy was/is a Knight of Malta so if Soros is now after Rudy, it means that Rudy has betrayed the Knights ie: the Papacy and it's guardians.

 

I certainly hope that the truth spills out all over the place yet I doubt that it will and so we will go with "That danged Jew Soros is picking on little old Italian Catholic Rudy!". kek

 

Oh yeah, I used the drops to come to this conclusion instead of listening to fairy tales promoted by PAYtriots, espoused by multiple felon white supremacist Alex Jones Flunkies but you do you, scro!

Anonymous ID: 59de0d Oct. 14, 2020, 11:29 p.m. No.11080284   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0365 >>0552

ANTI-FEDERALISM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Federalism

 

Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.

 

Major points

They believed the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights.true

They believed the Constitution created a presidency so powerful that it would become a monarchy. =Almost happened==

They believed the Constitution did too little with the courts and would create an out-of-control judiciary.happened

They believed that the national government would be too far away from the people and thus unresponsive to the needs of localities.happened

They believed the Constitution would abrogate, at least in part, the power of the states.[1]happened

 

History

During the American Revolution and its immediate aftermath, the term federal was applied to any person who supported the colonial union and the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. After the war, the group that felt the national government under the Articles was too weak appropriated the name Federalist for themselves. Historian Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of 'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress."[2]

 

As the Federalists moved to amend the Articles, eventually leading to the Constitutional Convention, they applied the term anti-federalist to their opposition. The term implied, correctly or not, both opposition to Congress and unpatriotic motives. The Anti-Federalists rejected the term, arguing that they were the true Federalists. In both their correspondence and their local groups, they tried to capture the term. For example, an unknown anti-federalist signed his public correspondence as "A Federal Farmer" and the New York committee opposing the Constitution was called the "Federal Republican Committee." However the Federalists carried the day and the name Anti-Federalist forever stuck.

 

Notable Anti-Federalists

Patrick Henry[8] Thomas Jefferson[8] Samuel Adams[9]

George Mason[8] Richard Henry Lee[10][11] Robert Yates[11]

James Monroe[8] Amos Singletary[12] Mercy Otis Warren[13][11]

James Warren George Clinton[14] Melancton Smith[8]

James Winthrop[8] Luther Martin[15] Samuel Bryan

 

The Ordeal of the Constitution: The Antifederalists and the Ratification

Struggle of 1787-1788

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ordeal_of_the_Constitution.html?id=mqQj501JO18C

Anonymous ID: 59de0d Oct. 14, 2020, 11:52 p.m. No.11080468   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11080365

I will assume that were feebly attempting to quote Alexander Hamilton.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton

 

Early in the Convention Hamilton made a speech proposing a President-for-Life; it had no effect upon the deliberations of the convention.

He proposed to have an elected president and elected senators who

would serve for life, contingent upon "good behavior" and subject to removal for corruption or abuse; this idea contributed later to the hostile view of Hamilton as a monarchist sympathizer, held by James Madison.[91]

Ultimately Hamilton wanted to take the idea of self government

out of the Constitution, claiming that power should go to the

"rich and well born".

This idea all but isolated Hamilton from his fellow delegates and others who were tempered in the ideas of revolution and liberty.[92]

 

According to Madison's notes, Hamilton said in regards to the executive,"The English model was the only good one on this subject.The hereditary interest of the king was so interwoven with that of the nation, and his personal emoluments so great, that he was placed above the danger of being corrupted from abroad…

Let one executive be appointed for life

who dares execute his powers."[93]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Hamilton_(lawyer)

Andrew Hamilton (c.1676 – August 4, 1741)

Anonymous ID: 59de0d Oct. 15, 2020, 12:06 a.m. No.11080574   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0651 >>0854

>>11080500

Acute observation, Anon yet he was young at the time.

Do you not find it off that Soros is anti Israel and pro the Boycott/Divest movement?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros

Views on antisemitism and Israel

When asked about what he thought about Israel, in The New Yorker, Soros replied: "I don't deny the Jews to a right to a national existence – but I don't want anything to do with it."[217] According to hacked emails released in 2016, Soros's Open Society Foundation has a self-described objective of "challenging Israel's racist and anti-democratic policies" in international forums, in part by questioning Israel's reputation as a democracy.[218] He has funded NGOs which have been actively critical of Israeli policies[219][220][221] including groups that campaign for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel.[219]

 

Speaking before a 2003 conference of the Jewish Funders Network, Soros said that the administrations of George W. Bush in the U.S. and Ariel Sharon in Israel, and even the unintended consequences of some of his own actions, were partially contributing to a new European antisemitism. Soros, citing accusations that he was one of the "Jewish financiers" who, in antisemitic terms, "ruled the world by proxy", suggested that if we change the direction of those policies, then anti-Semitism also will diminish. Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League later said that Soros's comments held a simplistic view, were counterproductive, biased and a bigoted perception of what's out there, and "blamed the victim" when holding Jews responsible for antisemitism. Jewish philanthropist Michael Steinhardt, who arranged for Soros's appearance at the conference, clarified, "George Soros does not think Jews should be hated any more than they deserve to be."[222] Soros has also said that Jews can overcome antisemitism by "giv[ing] up on the tribalness".[223]

 

What good little Vatican stooge would say? For $1000, Alex!