Anonymous ID: 591551 Oct. 15, 2020, 12:28 p.m. No.11088380   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8444 >>8449 >>8466

>>11088325

Do you sick fucks really want to see some snuff vid or other disgusting illegal shit?

I think seeing it will do no good.

If there are really tapes, then there should really be arrests.

Publicizing evidence would taint jury pools.

Then they'd walk free laughing at us all.

Anonymous ID: 591551 Oct. 15, 2020, 12:35 p.m. No.11088520   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8546

>>11088444

If someone gets arrested for being involved in some snuff vid… that person/people would eventually end up in front of a jury right?

If the evidence was already publicly shared worldwide, the jury pool would be corrupted/tainted right?

Or is my idea of how a prosecution works incorrect?

Anonymous ID: 591551 Oct. 15, 2020, 1:04 p.m. No.11089006   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Any of yous out there in California?

Can we trust this thing I found linked on Twitter "California: Election news and updates"?

It seems to be some kind of ballot tracker..

https://california.ballottrax.net/voter/