Anonymous ID: 5d0294 Oct. 15, 2020, 12:32 p.m. No.11088464   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8480 >>8538

Q, I can't get the same numbers you do.

 

jan-sep 2.39M all causes of death.

 

2.39/39wks = 61.3k/wk

 

61.3k/wk * 52 = 3.18 Million

 

That's a serious error in data interpretation and actually proves the numbers are right re Covid - at least reported correctly.

Anonymous ID: 5d0294 Oct. 15, 2020, 12:35 p.m. No.11088500   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11088480

 

I have the data in a database, the raw numbers. So until you can tell me why, you're wrong.

 

Until Q explains how they got that number, it looks wrong, and it's not from the CDC dataset.

Anonymous ID: 5d0294 Oct. 15, 2020, 12:50 p.m. No.11088781   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8840

>>11088664

 

What I claimed is the Q either should explain how they got the number they did - or they didn't get it from the CDC data.

 

The Data I'm using has always been the CDC data. I literally exported it from the page Q provided.

 

Being Q does not make them immune from errors.

Anonymous ID: 5d0294 Oct. 15, 2020, 12:55 p.m. No.11088864   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11088840

If Q is going to cite CDC as his source for proving CDC wrong - then I should at least be able to do the same with the CDC numbes.

 

Do you see the problem?