>>11088880 (lb)
Think like a perv:
>>11088889 (lb)
So he can go back and watch it.
Feel sick, yet?
>No one truly knows where Scaramucci falls.
That's the point, innit? I like your theory, BTW. Mucci is one of my favorites, good or bad.
Here's the problem.
DJT retweets a story. That doesn't mean it's the real story, but that there's a there, there. Now within a few hours, we get BOMBARDED, Millie Weaver style, with content. Some bit, some others didn't.
Anons have learned to be cautious.
You are currently standing in a battlefield. Information warfare. It's a real bitch, but you got to take it one step at a time, dissect, meditate on it, and trust yourself.
You have to do your best to wade through the nonsense. Sometimes, you get slivers of truth in a distorted narrative (Most MSM outlets). Sometimes, you get more truth, with whacked out garbledy gook to throw you off at the last minute (Alex Jones types). You also get some Big names that connect most of the dots, but are wrong in some assumptions without specifying the assumption part. Then you get big names that take you most of the way there and are intentionally throwing you off, similar to AJ. Best thing to do is pick a few sources, and check those sources' sources. Where are they getting their info from?
It takes time, and I still get tons of shit wrong. This type of work really isn't my forte because I'm a "trusting type". That's what they take advantage of. You have to turn that off, and look strictly at the FACTS. Then, you have to do the hardest thing of all:
Trust yourself.
Yes, you've totally convinced me he's a sack of shit by saying he's a sack of shit.