Supreme Court not taking the Malwarebytes case makes effective the Ninth Court conclusion that "[CDA 230] immunity is unavailable when a plaintiff alleges anticompetitive conduct."This means @twitter has (probably) ALREADY lost CDA230 liability protections.(1/4)
The @nypost just needs to sue @twitter and allege anticompetitive conduct to effectively strip @twitter of liability protections under CDA230 by claiming that twitter allows liberal media but not @nypost's investigative journalism. (2/4)
Alternatively, the federal government (@FEC maybe?) could prosecute @twitter for election interference, and strip twitter of CDA230 liability protection by alleging anticompetitive conduct due to censorship of content from @realDonaldTrump (3/4)
Another avenue would be the @FCC, via
@AjitPaiFCC, issuing an interpretation supporting the
@GOP that @twitter is acting in bad faith, and opening them up to liability by effectively removing the "good samaritan" censorship clause of CDA 230 for them: Section 230(c)(2).
(4/4)