>>11096055

Q said to drop reference to him when trying to redpill. This does not do that. quite frankly they are shitty memes.

>>11096236

yes but show the tweet that talks about impeaching a vice president. thanks.

>>11096333

>https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/06/can-former-presidents-be-impeached

you are correct. he can be impeached but since he is not currently holding office the only penalty is disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.

>>11096396

see

>>11096386

>>11096333

>>11096424

the article makes it clear impeachment does not include criminal penalties.

>>11096444

I do not believe this is correct. you are conflating two different things.

>>11096457

you can impeach a former president and vice president. since they are not holding office the only punishment is barring them from holding office again.

>>11096550

his post is fake and ghey. he is exaggerating his claim.

>>11096594

THIS