Anonymous ID: 2dcde5 Oct. 15, 2020, 9:16 p.m. No.11098236   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8370 >>8641 >>8702 >>8830 >>8937

The 2020 Election Bamboozle: We Are All Victims of the Deep State’s Con Game

 

 

“We’re run by the Pentagon, we’re run by Madison Avenue, we’re run by television, and as long as we accept those things and don’t revolt we’ll have to go along with the stream to the eventual avalanche…. As long as we go out and buy stuff, we’re at their mercy… We all live in a little Village. Your Village may be different from other people’s Villages, but we are all prisoners.”— Patrick McGoohan

 

This is not an election.

 

This is a con game, a scam, a grift, a hustle, a bunko, a swindle, a flimflam, a gaffle, and a bamboozle.

 

In this carefully choreographed scheme to strip the American citizenry of our power and our rights, “we the people” are nothing more than marks, suckers, stooges, mugs, rubes, or gulls.

 

We are victims of the Deep State’s confidence game.

 

Every confidence game has six essential stages: 1) the foundation to lay the groundwork for the illusion; 2) the approach whereby the victim is contacted; 3) the build-up to make the victim feel like they’ve got a vested interest in the outcome; 4) the corroboration (aided by third-party conspirators) to legitimize that the scammers are, in fact, on the up-and-up; 5) the pay-off, in which the victim gets to experience some small early “wins”; and 6) the “hurrah”— a sudden manufactured crisis or change of events that creates a sense of urgency.

 

In this particular con game, every candidate dangled before us as some form of political savior—including Donald Trump and Joe Biden—is part of a long-running, elaborate scam intended to persuade us that, despite all appearances to the contrary, we live in a constitutional republic.

 

In this way, the voters are the dupes, the candidates are the shills, and as usual, it’s the Deep State rigging the outcome.

 

Terrorist attacks, pandemics, civil unrest: these are all manipulated crises that add to the sense of urgency and help us feel invested in the outcome of the various elections, but it doesn’t change much in the long term.

 

No matter who wins this election, we’ll all still be prisoners of the Deep State.

 

We just haven’t learned to recognize our prison walls as such.

 

It’s like that old British television series The Prisoner, which takes place in a mysterious, self-contained, cosmopolitan, seemingly idyllic retirement community known only as The Village.

 

Perhaps the best visual debate ever on individuality and freedom, The Prisoner (17 episodes in all) centers around a British secret agent who abruptly resigns only to find himself imprisoned, monitored by militarized drones, and interrogated in The Village, a beautiful resort with parks and green fields, recreational activities and even a butler.

 

While luxurious, the Village is a virtual prison disguised as a seaside paradise: its inhabitants have no true freedom, they cannot leave the Village, they are under constant surveillance, all of their movements tracked. Residents of the Village are stripped of their individuality and identified only by numbers.

 

First broadcast in Great Britain 50-some years ago, The Prisoner dystopian television series —described as “James Bond meets George Orwell filtered through Franz Kafka”—confronted societal themes that are still relevant today: the rise of a police state, the loss of freedom, round-the-clock surveillance, the corruption of government, totalitarianism, weaponization, group think, mass marketing, and the tendency of human beings to meekly accept their lot in life as prisoners in a prison of their own making.

 

The series’ protagonist, played by Patrick McGoohan is Number Six.

 

https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_2020_election_bamboozle_we_are_all_victims_of_the_deep_states_con_game

Anonymous ID: 2dcde5 Oct. 15, 2020, 9:18 p.m. No.11098267   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Daryl Maguire heard lobbying NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian in phone call played at ICAC

 

Disgraced former MP Daryl Maguire has been heard lobbying his former partner, NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian, regarding a deal he thought could make him $1.5 million.

Key points:

 

Mr Maguire was quizzed on the extent of the information he shared with Ms Berejiklian

The inquiry heard an intercepted phone call between Mr Maguire and Ms Berejiklian

Investigation launched into publication of transcript of a closed private hearing

 

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) is looking into whether the former Wagga Wagga MP used his position for financial gain.

 

Mr Maguire initially told the Commission he limited how much he told Ms Berejiklian about a deal he was working on involving land in Western Sydney, owned by Louise Waterhouse's Smart West, because he thought it would create a conflict of interest and place her in a difficult position.

 

Mr Maguire and Ms Berejiklian were, at the time, in a relationship.

 

During this morning's hearing, Mr Maguire was quizzed on the extent of the information he shared with Ms Berejiklian.

 

"In relation to Smart West, I understand the NSW Government was making a decision almost constantly how that project would be brought to fruition?" asked Assistant Commissioner RuthMcColl.

Live blog: Follow all the latest updates from today's ICAC hearing

 

Mr Maguire replied: "Yes, there would have been."

 

"That would be an obvious conflict of interest?" said Assistant Commissioner McColl.

 

"Yes," Mr Maguire said.

 

The hearing was played an intercepted phone call between Mr Maguire and Ms Berejiklian in October 2017 where he discussed meetings he sought with the Premier's staff to help rectify a planning issue for Ms Waterhouse.

 

MAGUIRE: "I had coffee with Louise Waterhouse".

 

BEREJIKLIAN: "Oh yeah, how's she going?"

 

MAGUIRE: "Yeah good. She's got a big problem so I took up to your office and said here can you help solve it. She's got a lot of property out at Badgerys Creek …"

 

BEREJIKLIAN: "Yeah."

 

MAGUIRE: "… and the Planning Department right, and and RMS and all them, are saying look you know, we, we don't want to plan that now, we're too busy worrying about you know, the new housing and all this around Badgerys Creek.

 

"And she's saying but, you know, I need a road, I need an access, give me an access. I'll develop it myself, I don't need you, right."

 

BEREJIKLIAN: "Mmm."

 

MAGUIRE: "And they're resisting. She said I've been two years trying to get this road on. She said and."

 

BEREJIKLIAN: "Mmm."

 

MAGUIRE: "… and they just won't do anything and I said OK. So I got Roads, I got Jock to come down and I got um, one bloke from your place there, got them to put their heads together and said look, why can't you fix this."

 

"They, they need to extend the, the, the thing 300 metres right and, and there's no change in it. You know put 300 metres and she can get on with the job. Honestly. I just, you know, nobody wants to do anything."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-16/legal-investigation-begins-into-icac-private-hearing-published/12774696

 

Despite all this evidence the Jew Premier still claims she did no wrong! Just like the Kabbalah says lie to the Goyim!

Anonymous ID: 2dcde5 Oct. 15, 2020, 9:19 p.m. No.11098282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8324

The “Smoking Guns” of a Manufactured Pandemic!

 

Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.

Profile image

498

1

By John Rolls (Reporter)

Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views

Now: 24

Last hour: 75

Last 24 hours: 417

Total: 417

The “Smoking Guns” of a Manufactured Pandemic! - Must Video

Thursday, October 15, 2020 19:52

facebook sharing button

twitter sharing button

pinterest sharing button

linkedin sharing button

messenger sharing button

reddit sharing button

tumblr sharing button

vk sharing button

telegram sharing button

sharethis sharing button

 

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky and Kristina Borjesson

 

Economics professor Michel Chossudovsky describes the “smoking guns” indicating that the Covid-19 pandemic is a fraud and details the devastation that already has occurred as well as what is to come with the so-called “second wave,” which he says is also based on fake statistics and testing.

 

“Closing down the Global Economy as a means to combating the Killer Virus. That’s what they want us to believe. If the public had been informed that Covid-19 is “similar to Influenza”, the fear campaign would have fallen flat…”

 

Confirmed by prominent scientists as well as by official public health bodies including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Covid-19 is a public health concern but it is NOT a dangerous virus.

 

Awarding winning journalist and author Kristina Borjesson interviews Michel Chossudovky on the Covid 19.

 

Good redpill for normies

Anonymous ID: 2dcde5 Oct. 15, 2020, 9:22 p.m. No.11098317   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Twitter caves and reverses policies on NY Post story ban after furious backlash

 

They are changing policies on banning content on Twitter

 

Twitter reversed course on Thursday and said that they would allow users to post a controversial New York post story damaging to the Joe Biden presidential campaign.

 

Twitter's head of legal, policy, trust and safety, Vijaya Gadde, tweeted Thursday evening that after much public input, they would be changing their policies to allow people to post the story and others like it.

 

On Wednesday Twitter clarified that they had banned the posting of the story because it included personal and private information, something that is prohibited by Twitter's terms of use. Critics of the social media giant accused it of banning the story in order to help Democrats and influence the election.

 

Gadde explained why they decided to change course.

 

"Over the last 24 hours, we've received significant feedback (from critical to supportive) about how we enforced our Hacked Materials Policy yesterday. After reflecting on this feedback, we have decided to make changes to the policy and how we enforce it," she tweeted.

 

Over the last 24 hours, we’ve received significant feedback (from critical to supportive) about how we enforced our… https://t.co/9vr4GU0KUp

— Vijaya Gadde (@Vijaya Gadde)1602814016.0

 

Gadde explained that the ban policy was implemented in 2018 but that Twitter had since then developed new tools to aid in stopping the spread of unsubstantiated reports.

 

"We believe that labeling Tweets and empowering people to assess content for themselves better serves the public interest and public conversation. The Hacked Material Policy is being updated to reflect these new enforcement capabilities," Gadde continued.

 

"So, what's changing? 1. We will no longer remove hacked content unless it is directly shared by hackers or those acting in concert with them 2. We will label Tweets to provide context instead of blocking links from being shared on Twitter," she added.

 

She went on to thank everyone for their input.

 

Some, like reporter Andrew Feinberg were critical of the decision.

 

"How much did the bullying from GOP senators factor into this decision," he tweeted to Gadde.

 

CNN analyst and former FBI agent Asha Rangappa accused Twitter of aiding foreign adversaries in spreading fake news.

 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/twitter-reverses-nypost-biden-ban