Anonymous ID: c5d1ea Oct. 16, 2020, 3:41 a.m. No.11100888   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11100570

Have you ever got into writing something yet thought "Nah, man I better not!"? kek

I mean, yer winning and you beat their asses daily yet do they really deserve to be crucified upside down?

 

They would have done as much to you yet you are supposed to be better than them.

Better, yeahโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: c5d1ea Oct. 16, 2020, 4:11 a.m. No.11101103   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1142

REALITY CHECK

6 of the remaining Supreme Court Justices are Deep State appointments. Prove me wrong! kek

 

John Roberts is a known traitor so if a tie, we lose as he will cast the deciding vote for Biden unless he has now been flipped. Prove me wrong!

 

If the above is true. ACB nom is not really that important at all is it?

Prove me wrong!

 

Maybe it is all so we will discuss the structure and History of the Supreme court and also Religion and it's place in Politics?

 

False left right paradigm.

Religion is all that matters! attacks on ACB religion

Religion does not matter at all! defense of ACB religion

 

Scalia was a Deep state POS good friend of Dick Cheney and RBG. Prove me wrong! kek

 

I say we disband the whole fucking thing and whatever the lower courts cannot decide goes to a vote in the next national election!

 

Ewww I bet WE THE PEOPLE frightens some people!

 

Discuss and Enjoy!

Anonymous ID: c5d1ea Oct. 16, 2020, 4:13 a.m. No.11101121   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1161 >>1186 >>1283

ANTI-FEDERALISM

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Federalism

Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution.

The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried,

among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation,

Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.

 

Major points

They believed the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights.true

They believed the Constitution created a presidency so powerful that it would become a monarchy.Almost happened

They believed the Constitution did too little with the courts and would create an out-of-control judiciary.happened

They believed that the national government would be too far away from the people and thus unresponsive to the needs of localities.happened

They believed the Constitution would abrogate, at least in part, the power of the states.[1]happened

 

History

During the American Revolution and its immediate aftermath, the term federal was applied to any person who supported the colonial union and the government formed under the Articles of Confederation.

After the war, the group that felt the national government under the Articles was too weak appropriated the name Federalist for themselves. Historian Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of

'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress."[2]

 

As the Federalists moved to amend the Articles, eventually leading to the Constitutional Convention, they applied the term anti-federalist to their opposition. The term implied, correctly or not,

both opposition to Congress and unpatriotic motives. The Anti-Federalists rejected the term, arguing that they were the true Federalists. In both their correspondence and their local groups,

they tried to capture the term. For example, an unknown anti-federalist signed his public correspondence as "A Federal Farmer" and the New York committee opposing the Constitution was called the

"Federal Republican Committee." However the Federalists carried the day and the name Anti-Federalist forever stuck.

 

Notable Anti-Federalists

Patrick Henry[8] Thomas Jefferson[8] Samuel Adams[9]

George Mason[8] Richard Henry Lee[10][11] Robert Yates[11]

James Monroe[8] Amos Singletary[12] Mercy Otis Warren[13][11]

James Warren George Clinton[14] Melancton Smith[8]

James Winthrop[8] Luther Martin[15] Samuel Bryan

 

The Ordeal of the Constitution: The Antifederalists and the Ratification

Struggle of 1787-1788

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ordeal_of_the_Constitution.html?id=mqQj501JO18C

Anonymous ID: c5d1ea Oct. 16, 2020, 4:18 a.m. No.11101161   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11101121

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton

 

Constitutional Convention and ratification of the Constitution

In 1787, Hamilton served as assemblyman from New York County in the New York State Legislature and was chosen as a delegate for the Constitutional Convention by his father-in-law Philip Schuyler.[87]:191[88] Even though Hamilton had been a leader in calling for a new Constitutional Convention, his direct influence at the Convention itself was quite limited. Governor George Clinton's faction in the New York legislature had chosen New York's other two delegates, John Lansing Jr. and Robert Yates, and both of them opposed Hamilton's goal of a strong national government.[89][90] Thus, whenever the other two members of the New York delegation were present, they decided New York's vote, to ensure that there were no major alterations to the Articles of Confederation.[87]:195

 

Early in the Convention Hamilton made a speech proposing a President-for-Life; it had no effect upon the deliberations of the convention.He proposed to have an elected president and electedsenators who would serve for life, contingent upon "good behavior" and subject to removal for corruption or abuse; this idea contributed later to the hostile view of Hamilton as a monarchist sympathizer, held by James Madison.[91]Ultimately Hamilton wanted to take the

idea of self government out of the Constitution,

claiming that power should go to the "rich and well born".

This idea all but isolated Hamilton from his fellow delegates and others who were tempered in the ideas of revolution and liberty.[92]

 

According to Madison's notes, Hamilton said in regards to the executive,

"The English model was the only good one on this subject.

he hereditary interest of the king was so interwoven with that

of the nation, and his personal emoluments so great,

that he was placed above the danger of being corrupted from abroadโ€ฆ Let one executive be appointed for life who dares

execute his powers."[93]