Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 4:34 a.m. No.11101311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1342

>>11101280

tyb

Consider Anti federalism or I will find you! kek

 

ANTI-FEDERALISM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Federalism

Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution.

The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried,

among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation,

Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.

 

Major points

They believed the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights.true

They believed the Constitution created a presidency so powerful that it would become a monarchy.Almost happened

They believed the Constitution did too little with the courts and would create an out-of-control judiciary.happened

They believed that the national government would be too far away from the people and thus unresponsive to the needs of localities.happened

They believed the Constitution would abrogate, at least in part, the power of the states.[1]happened

 

History

During the American Revolution and its immediate aftermath, the term federal was applied to any person who supported the colonial union and the government formed under the Articles of Confederation.

After the war, the group that felt the national government under the Articles was too weak appropriated the name Federalist for themselves. Historian Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of

'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress."[2]

 

As the Federalists moved to amend the Articles, eventually leading to the Constitutional Convention, they applied the term anti-federalist to their opposition. The term implied, correctly or not,

both opposition to Congress and unpatriotic motives. The Anti-Federalists rejected the term, arguing that they were the true Federalists. In both their correspondence and their local groups,

they tried to capture the term. For example, an unknown anti-federalist signed his public correspondence as "A Federal Farmer" and the New York committee opposing the Constitution was called the

"Federal Republican Committee." However the Federalists carried the day and the name Anti-Federalist forever stuck.

 

Notable Anti-Federalists

Patrick Henry[8] Thomas Jefferson[8] Samuel Adams[9]

George Mason[8] Richard Henry Lee[10][11] Robert Yates[11]

James Monroe[8] Amos Singletary[12] Mercy Otis Warren[13][11]

James Warren George Clinton[14] Melancton Smith[8]

James Winthrop[8] Luther Martin[15] Samuel Bryan

 

The Ordeal of the Constitution: The Antifederalists and the Ratification

Struggle of 1787-1788

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ordeal_of_the_Constitution.html?id=mqQj501JO18C

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 4:39 a.m. No.11101342   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11101311

and Alexander Hamilton was a Piece of Deep State shit muahahah!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton

 

Constitutional Convention and ratification of the Constitution

In 1787, Hamilton served as assemblyman from New York County in the New York State Legislature and was chosen as a delegate for the Constitutional Convention by his father-in-law Philip Schuyler.[87]:191[88] Even though Hamilton had been a leader in calling for a new Constitutional Convention, his direct influence at the Convention itself was quite limited. Governor George Clinton's faction in the New York legislature had chosen New York's other two delegates, John Lansing Jr. and Robert Yates, and both of them opposed Hamilton's goal of a strong national government.[89][90] Thus, whenever the other two members of the New York delegation were present, they decided New York's vote, to ensure that there were no major alterations to the Articles of Confederation.[87]:195

 

Early in the Convention Hamilton made a speech

proposing a President-for-Life;it had no effect upon the deliberations of the convention. He proposed to have an elected president and elected senatorswho would serve for life,contingent upon "good behavior" and subject to removal for corruption or abuse; this idea contributed later to the hostile view of Hamilton as a monarchist sympathizer, held by James Madison.[91] Ultimately Hamilton wanted totake the idea of self government out of the Constitution,claiming thatpower should go to the "rich and well born".This idea all but isolated Hamilton from his fellow delegates and others who were tempered in the ideas of revolution and liberty.[92]

 

According to Madison's notes, Hamilton said in regards to the executive,"The English model was the only good oneon this subject. The hereditary interest of the king was so interwoven with that of the nation, and his personal emoluments so great, that he was placed above the danger of being corrupted from abroad… Let one executive be appointed for life who dares execute his powers."[93]

 

Hamilton argued, "And let me observe that an executive is less dangerous to the liberties of the people when in office during life than for seven years. It may be said this constitutes as an elective monarchy… But by making the executive subject to impeachment, the term 'monarchy' cannot apply…"[93] During the convention, Hamilton constructed a draft for the Constitution based on the convention debates, but he never presented it. This draft had most of the features of the actual Constitution. In this draft, the Senate was to be elected in proportion to the population, being two-fifths the size of the House, and the President and Senators were to be elected through complex multistage elections, in which chosen electors would elect smaller bodies of electors; they would hold office for life, but were removable for misconduct. The President would have an absolute veto. The Supreme Court was to have immediate jurisdiction over all lawsuits involving the United States, and state governors were to be appointed by the federal government.[94]

 

POWER IN THE HANDS OF THE FEW, CORRUPT AND CONTROL

This is an ongoing notable battle, you might not understand kek

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 4:43 a.m. No.11101366   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11101343

Rand Paul is knockin 'em out!

triggered!

Do Not Trust The Medical Or The National Security

Establishment!' With Guest Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

123,836 views • Aug 14, 2020

RonPaulLibertyReport

 

Amazing and very revealing interview with RFK Jr. where he basically says that theCIA killed both his Uncle JFK and his Father RFKyet he did not believe that his

father's death was a conspiracy before 1985 when he learned that his father was shot in the back of the head 4 times.

 

RFK starts right out of the gate revealing this stuff and goes on for 10 minutes until Ron tries to get him to focus on the pressing issue of Vaccines.

Notice the look in his eyes as he reveals these things.

https://youtu.be/_kJdOtnBUcw

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 4:44 a.m. No.11101376   🗄️.is 🔗kun

MEET THE GOD IN YOU

 

MATTHEW 10:33-38

33 “We are not stoning You for any good work,” said the Jews, “but for blasphemy, because You, who are a man, declare Yourself to be God.”

34 Jesus replied, “Is it not written in your Law: ‘I have said you are god's?

35 If he called them gods to whom the word of God came—and the Scripture cannot be broken—

36 then what about the One whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world? How then can you accuse Me of blasphemy for stating that I am the Son of God?

37 If I am not doing the works of My Father, then do not believe Me.

38 But if I am doing them, even though you do not believe Me, believe the works themselves, so that you may know and understand that the Father is in Me, and I am in the Father.”

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 4:49 a.m. No.11101409   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11101392

but you are all the fucking same

this mind control apparatus is what caused most of this shit to be possible in the first place and i aint trying to win and election so I will tell it to you straight.

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 5:07 a.m. No.11101517   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1534

>>11101490

As if Websters or Funk and Wagnals could not have been corrupted?

 

Some articles are locked to only the higher level editiors that have proven themselves etc etc yet sure! sure! all data could be corrupted.

We watch the news (water) all the time here yet we KNOW for certain it is corrupt.

Come on, man!

kek

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 5:26 a.m. No.11101661   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1691

>>11101534

Hearing that sort of response is like putting your feet into a cool stream on a hot summers day, anon! :D

This makes two times in two days!

WTF is this world coming too?!

I might not repeat this often yet I prefer being wrong to being right.

Wrong is hard and so it offers a greater opportunity for growth versus being right.

I am gonna go now and try to find something I am wrong about! kek

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 5:32 a.m. No.11101724   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11101577

notable

CATHOLIC Priest gets Federal Prison for breaking into Navy Base

"sincere religious beliefs!"

I have some sincere religious beliefs as well.

About protecting children from a system of predatory priests who swear allegiance first and foremost to a corrupt foreign government.

Prove me wrong!

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 5:54 a.m. No.11101921   🗄️.is 🔗kun

70% corrupt…

 

freed>flipped

 

Imagine if the 70% corrupt were forced to stay in place (flipped) and play their roles, on both sides, while the 30% are the ones who were allowed to leave in 2016 (freed) and/or the few rare innocent white hats, probably first term'ers.

 

I know, right?!!?!? KEK

Anonymous ID: ed710f Oct. 16, 2020, 6:02 a.m. No.11101981   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11101963

if china asshoe, vatican asshoe?

asking for asian fren

 

China - Vatican Secret Two Year Deal

Is the News Now

Article Links:

https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1202008.shtml

https://www.irishcatholic.com/pope-francis-considers-renewing-controversial-china-vatican-deal/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/vatican-officials-defend-accord-china-155226582.html

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-the-catholic-connection

https://stanfordartsreview.com/2020/09/23/the-pope-and-xi-jinping-anger-trump/

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4015093

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-vaticans-deal-with-the-dragon/

https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2020/09/22/china-seems-to-be-moving-closer-to-the-holy-see/

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/22/vatican-and-china-prepare-to-renew-historic-deal-angering-us

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2020/09/22/secretary-mike-pompeo-enters-vatican-china-agreement-debate

https://catholic-sf.org/news/vatican-china-agreement-secretary-pompeo-enters-the-debate

https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/09/23/news/world/china-vatican-renew-deal-in-naming-bishops/771011/

https://www.catholicregister.org/home/international/item/32122-pompeo-vatican-china-agreement-endangers-church-s-moral-authority

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8758453/Vatican-China-prepare-renew-historic-deal-US-anger.html

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/international/much-displeasure-to-us-vatican-china-prepare-to-renew-historic-deal/videoshow/78250043.cms

https://www.ucanews.com/news/vatican-china-agreement-pompeo-enters-the-debate/89607

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/cardinal-zen-church-is-losing-credibility-to-evangelize-china-32444

https://ricochet.com/803964/if-i-were-the-pope-id-deal-with-china-differently/

https://angelusnews.com/news/world/trumps-top-envoy-urges-vatican-to-challenge-china-on-religious-freedom/

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pompeo-warns-pope-dont-renew-china-deal

https://www.inquisitr.com/6290274/mike-pompeo-pope-francis-china/

https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2020/09/19/mike-pompeo-urges-vatican-call-out-china-religious-freedom-violations/

https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2020/09/18/u-s-commission-urges-vatican-to-prioritize-religious-freedom-in-deal-with-china/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/pope-francis-naive-in-deal-with-china-to-name-bishops-df8qjvhtx

http://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/human-rights-concerns-raised-as-vatican-extends-agreement/55617/1

https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/vatican-gives-green-light-extending-agreement-china-60363