Anonymous ID: df15ae Oct. 16, 2020, 8:54 a.m. No.11103614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3630 >>3632 >>3638 >>3640 >>3655 >>3660 >>3673 >>3680

>>11103585

>>11103587

I'm going to be 100% honest, here. I don't want to have NOTHING to do with the files on that hard drive. I do wonder how they are going to get it to the public without breaking all sorts of laws at the local, state, and federal level, though.

 

This right here is what's got me scratching my head. How are the public going to know without seeing for themselves? How could it possibly be distributed without breaking tons of laws?

Anonymous ID: df15ae Oct. 16, 2020, 8:58 a.m. No.11103659   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11103630

>>11103632

 

What I'm talking about is the nature of the content. Think "underage obsessions". People won't believe it till they see it, and those that distribute/host it are going to be liable. It's a catch 22; one of those "You have to take my word for it" type of deal.

 

The only way I see this working is if it's processed in a closed-door court, and he's convicted of it. Then the news reports it and the public just has to "trust" it's real.

>>11103638

This.

 

>>11103640

Well, I see what you are saying, but a good portion of that evidence an never be released. You understand why, right?