Q

You may want to look into the YouTube channel "7 6" … it was renamed today from "7 9" … anons on this board say it's a LARP but we're seeing info that says otherwise; they're unable to investigate to know anything conclusively so they're just guessing and calling it fact. Q team can find out for sure. This is a message posted in QR2 regarding findings in one of the vids:

WTF??

+29 (19)

03/8/2018

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8skfA32rsg

75 79 90 75 45 84 86 32 109 117 115 116 32 110 111 116 32 98 114 111 97 100 99 97 115 116 32 115 116 111 114 121 46 32 66 114 105 110 103 32 100 111 119 110 32 116 104 101 105 114 32 116 111 119 101 114 32 105 102 32 110 101 101 100 32 98 101 44 32 115 116 111 114 121 32 115 101 116 32 102 111 114 32 48 52 45 49 57 45 49 56

Description Decode

"KOZK-TV must not broadcast story. Bring down their tower if need be, story set for 04-19-18"

Per WIKI: "On April 19, 2018 at about 9:32 AM the KOZK transmission tower on Switchgrass Rd. north of Fordland Missouri collapsed while undergoing a structural upgrade for the upcoming spectrum re-pack. One worker lost their life and three were transported to area hospitals in unknown condition."

It doesn't hurt to look at it. If people are going to the hospital, then this is not white hats.

>>1110968

This code came from the video's description which could have been modified after the tower fell, still leaving the whole channel a LARP. The video descriptions are being changed frequently so it's probably a LARP channel but it still doesn't hurt to look into it. The videos themselves cannot be updated; YT doesn't allow it, but descriptions can be modified at any time.

>>1110979

Which message #?

>>1111078

They're not good guys IF they're real, and so far there is no conclusive evidence they're legit. No conclusive evidence they're not either. An event needs to be referenced by a video, then come to pass. And it has to be via text in the video itself which YT does not allow modifying. 7 9 (now 7 6) is changing their video descriptions often. So they could easily be referencing events after they happen - i.e. the TV station tower ( >>1110968 ); the video was created March 8, 2018 but the description which holds the coded text could have been changed any time today. So that can't be construed as proof.

>>1111164

This is why I'm pointing out that the video description - which contains the message - could have been modified today after the tower fell. I'm not drawing any conclusions here, just trying to get to the truth.