▶Anonymous 10/16/20 (Fri) 18:36:41cc2e9d (5) No.11108469
What stuck with me was when Q asked this.
>What has to happen for MIL to take over 3 letter agencies?
Then is asks,
>What has to happen for civilian trials to take place?
Can't remember the post number but it's the order that struck me.
Could it be that the military could step up, lawfully, remove the DS, lawfully, re-institute lawful public courts, and do it that way? At least for some? Most? Tribunals only for the worst of the worst? Spitballin'
Spitballin' good questions, Anon. I'm doing the same:
What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?
The Marines are the only branch of service that falls directly under executive command
10 U.S. Code § 8063 - United States Marine Corps: composition; functions
In addition, the Marine Corps shall provide detachments and organizations for service on armed vessels of the Navy, shall provide security detachments for the protection of naval property at naval stations and bases, and shall perform such other duties as the President may direct. However, these additional duties may not detract from or interfere with the operations for which the Marine Corps is primarily organized.
"Focus on the power of POTUS as it relates to the Marines."
The National Security Act of 1947, amended in 1952, specifies the duties of the USMC to include: "perform such other duties as the president may direct."
How can MI be applied to prosecute bad actors and avoid corrupt agencies and judges?
10 U.S. Code § 252 - Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1)so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2)opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.