Anonymous ID: 5461a0 Oct. 17, 2020, 9:21 a.m. No.11118482   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8759

I think it's not incorrect to describe the plan as a real world documentary where for the first time ever he general public have found themselves as playing the role of a global grand jury, being presented with evidence of crimes the truth of which needed to be declassified (by the military otherwise it would have remained hidden), where the judge is no one person or group of people, it's all of us, it's all we see, it's all we are doing with all of what we are learning, it's all of humanity.

When all of humanity produces from within itself a 'open source' self-awareness of information previously and intentionally kept hidden to cover up pure evil, I also think it's not incorrect to describe events as 'biblical', without needing to view any historical events written in the bible as having happened exactly as described, because information/knowledge can logically be understood as partially corrupted for precisely the same reason we can grasp contemporary disclosures of information of what truthfully is happening, not what fake news outputs as their information narrative that has revealed itself as divided from humanity's general awareness, as controlled to intentionally perpetuate and exacerbate the division of information awareness within all of humanity.

God was always the truth.

Without informational unity, humanity remains in self-conflict, practical deceit vs. practical truth, the practising of deception vs. the practising of truth.

 

The division starts from the notion that reality of humanity is one of self-alienation, which is used to 'justify' the narrative that to engage in evil is not really 'evil' at all, but as itself 'caused' or 'determined by' the non-ego world, the material, the 'stuff' with its own 'self'-determined 'laws' like gravity and momentum, or, as in the communist views of Marx, the 'fetters' to our unlimited drive to 'freedom' solely brought about by 'productive forces' that have previously been responsible for human division and conflict.

To think for oneself has indeed always been the greatest fear of the very much non-necessary global scope practitioners of deception, whose only self-admitted justification is the notion humanity IS divided no matter what anyone says or does, save of course the practitioners of deception who are in fact doing nothing but projecting their own inner self-alienated view of good (for them/friends) and evil (to the 'sheep' who are they are told on an 'opium for the masses'), i.e. they have accepted the notion the evil (as would be 'named' by 'the sheep') is a 'new' personality trait, or 'new reality' as having 'manifested' in that experience of evil actions as not inner viewed as evil as the 'information' has divided from humanity so exploit 'the sheep' who have taken 'control' over 'that' set of information 'determined by' their choice to TRUST it…becoming a part of 'the sheep's' own being, of perception and thought and 'reality'.

 

Would you accept a reality where 1's are falsely seen as 0's and where 0's are falsely seen as 1's in the minds of people on such a scale that this is really why and how we can say correctly that 98% worldwide can be controlled by 2% if the 2% are passionate enough about information weaponization (politicization of philosophy) where itcouldbemade possible for 98% to believe a deception of a unity of subject and object through a corresponding 98% trust 2% deception practise of deception based on a false historicist narrative push within the narrative that divides what is true from 98%?

 

The philosophy of 'power' depends on this deception.

 

Why are the largest social/digital STREAM OF INFORMATION, WHICH IS AT THIS TIME RIGHT NOW WHAT 'THE NEWS' IS, TRUSTED IS THS LOGIC OF NO CENSORSHIP OF TRUTH OF 'BOTH' 'POLITICAL PARTIES' BUT SEQUENTIAL HENCE COMPARITIVE ANALYTICS CAN BE MADE IN THE FORM OF THESE. ANON. POSTS.