Heir Bing!
modern times
he went off with his Kerouac.
all Jack ever really wanted was to go home.
'fact-checking' is adhering to an unknown style guide where the censors decide without any standards what can and can not be posted.
it's basically censorship of arbitrary authority and a violation of ethical social media hosting.
what about Josepheus? was he wrong about how many were killed when the Jews burnned down the temple and then blamed the Romans?
if we debunk him will Facebook ban us?
PS: obviously I am trolling. I have no idea who really destroyed Herod's temple.
my point: if people start questioning the '1 million killed' that Josepheus stated, which many have doubted as being an exageration, will Facebook suddenly see you as 'antisemetic' because you discuss a 1945 year old story? (or so, I didn't get the exact math).
my point: it would show that they are biased and bogus if they also banned discussions of Josepheus and if his numbers were correct.
well that's just such a drippy little leak
PS: most people won't want the nitty gritty like that but . . .
wow if true.
can you remind your audience what 'darnkess' might somehow connect to in Q drop ?
I have a memory of it but . . . fog of war prevents it from materializing in a way that I could Q-splain it to the masses.
but it's something like 10 days of darkness is a misquote?
darkness misspelled darnkess for a reason once?
the escallation of their slander is clear when you know what they do.
I charted it out yesterday in a side-bread.
basically they conflate some title with being haters, and then conflate that further with them being nazis, which where they get to the part that they would do to you what they would do to nazis. It's almost unreal because of how diabolical it is.
but they do it gleefully.
and sometimes people will even do it to your face.