>>11127288 (PB)

>Bakers have been just notabling whatever they want for a long time now.

>Haven't looked but I bet the majority of notables in this bread include no ANON input

>>11127314 (PB)

>yes bakers give thier sic.[their] support to selected posts and as such is a form of endorsement

>but it is the BOARD and ANONS that do not endorse

It's ok for Bakers to collect and include.

It's when they FAIL to include anon NOM's,

Or Include what Anons over-rule, that is gets to be a problem.

GLORIOUS

>>11127485

God, feelin' old watching POTUS!

And I'm a spry odlfag!

>>11127530

>>11127531

kek - hive mind cars!

>>11127521

>Jrfags get the filter and the rope.

But, just imagine if you had to eat the crow?

Gud times fren, gud times.

>>11127497

>That gif is terrifying.

Agreed!

>>11127517

and oldie but goodie! Not sure had saved previously..

>>11127629

>anons need to shout out notables

Agreed, and collect if able.

ty fren.