So has Q confirmed that the question has NOT yet been asked?
>>11118631 (pb Q)
There is Q, and there are Anons. There is no "QAnon."
We can infer that, since the "QAnon" moniker is a false equivalency made re: Q and Anons, and since MSM hacks have so far been smearing and asking about "QAnon" specifically, they haven't yet asked about any real entity.
We can also infer that, since they want to tie Q and Anons together, being tied to Anons would constitute a vulnerability to Q. Anons can be anybody and can say anything, so casting Q and Anons as the same entity would make it possible to discredit Q by tying them to "injected" Anons (shills, etc.) posting bad info and "conspiracy theories."
"Not all Anons are Anons" seems to indicate a reference to shills playing the part of Anon in order to smear us.
I have to wonder what would happen if someone asked about "Q" or "Q and Anonymous" or even "Q Clearance Patriot." Though I doubt the media would ever make that distinction, we know that this way of phrasing it is more correct. Q has said as much, but we've been saying so for ages as well.