THANQ4 Bacon
>>11127938 (LB)
>>11127938 (LB)
>>11127938 (LB)
RE: HAVE EVERY ARTICLE DEMOLISHING SCAMDEMIC NARRATIVE
I've got a MEGA link for you (couldn't make it before bread chg sorry)
(I had to re-write the article as RTF / DOC and PDF for you)
give it a few minutes to populate…
I tried to make a rich text file format
a "Doc" format (in Open office)
and a PDF format that you can grab from the Mega link…
In the RTF file (rich text) you can scroll down to the PCR section (bold) and grab a Screen cap for your site. (REMOVE ASTERISKS ** from link)
the link is the decryption device….
give me a sec to upload the files…
THANK YOU
https://mega.nz/folder/6PBCgJTK#KldQwKuTnJD3j4uh3pwbgw
THERE is also a VIDEO being uploaded to that folder (95 megabytes?) of the German Lawyer (one of four) FYI
Give it some time to upload (it's uploading now) The RTF / DOC / and PDF are uploaded as of now here is a Screen Cap (and text)
of the PCR portion.
--
The PCR Test Fraud
First of all, the PCR test have not been approved for diagnostic purposes. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly yet unsuccessfully stressed that this test should not be used as a diagnostic tool. As noted by Fuellmich:
"[PCR tests] are simply incapable of diagnosing any disease … A positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they're infected with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Even the United States CDC … agrees with this and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests dated July 13 2020:36
Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.
This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
The PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible. Everything over 35 cycles is … considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable.
However, the Drosten test as well as the WHO recommended tests … are set to 45 cycles. Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?"
>>11127315 (OP) (LB)
RE: OP Posted CV19 DISMANTLED: HAVE EVERY ARTICLE DEMOLISHING THE SCAMDEMIC NARRATIVE AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
ALL LEGIT AND CURATED SOURCES. ITS ALL HERE. THE TRUTH WILL SET US ALL FREE.
RE: your Live & Updated: https://pastelink.net/1z94s
Archive: https://archive.is/mjKjZ
LINK to the newly uploaded VIDEO for your archive
as well as the Article behind the paywall NOW available as a PDF / DOC and RTF (simple rich text format)
Here is your Mega link again
https://mega.nz/folder/6PBCgJTK#KldQwKuTnJD3j4uh3pwbgw
Direct Link to PDF article ONLINE
https://mega.nz/folder/6PBCgJTK#KldQwKuTnJD3j4uh3pwbgw
As did a lot of other pple in that "era" I understand
He also invented PCR on a cocktail napkin while drinking and surfing
But he's still brilliant.
He also started the brilliant phrase:
Quantitative PCR is an Oxymoron
(which is absolutely true)
and
Viral Load is a Viral Load of Crap
which got around in the day and picked up by a reporter Lauritson I believe
Possibly.
Thankfully the ONLY thing about Kary Mullis that I need to know is that HE (the inventor of PCR)
insists that it is being used fraudulently.
As for true brilliance that is reserved for
Heinrich Kremer and David Rasnick