>>11129594 lb

Well, we've really veered away from the original topic, but I suppose I can entertain you:

>Did a perfect man ever exist?

That's not what this place is for, anon. "Perfection" knows no reality here, at least in a soul sense. Besides, the concept of "perfection" varies away from the actual definition of the word all too often. "Perfect" things do not exist because entropy is just as much apart of this place as is order.

>If so could he be full man?

This question gives us a little more room to stretch. To be blunt though, of course not.

>would he have to carry some sort of "divine right"?

The real answer is that all of us have the "divine right" within us.

In reality, the story is a lesson on how to achieve enlightenment. Jesus offered us a formula just as the previous iterations did.

>>11129633 lb

>His mission on Earth was to bring the message to the Jews.

You realize the Old Testament is told from one perspective and that the New Testament is told from another, right?…

You'll find that the Light-Bringer was a antagonist in the Old Testament and that the same being was /ourguy/ in the New Testament.

By the way, Revelations talks about Canaanites when they mention "those who say they are Jews but are not."

You got got, anon.

>>11129778

Nah, I was one of the ones to toss around the ideas of Jr.

If this board still contained a considerable amount of chan culture (which seems to really be lacking anymore), you would call me an oldfag, but that's unimportant.

Being frank, it's literal protocol to "give someone a new identity" via witpro…

Still, I'm admittedly nowhere near as invested in the idea as plenty here appear to be.

>>11129815

>Enlightenment without using force is what Jesus stand for right?

So long as the New Testament is accurate enough, he taught through parables, which related intimately to different themes surrounding general requisites for said "formula".

>i never understood why the JEW didnt kill Jesus themselves

Well, it's pretty simple.

They didn't.

>>11129835

etyomology is much more important than plenty here seem to observe.

>>11129851

Good. That's your role, fren.

It's imperative that we calm everyone during the looming storm.

Keep it up, fren. Be easy on them.

>>11129873

The point is for you to observe what they're expending ammunition against.

An enemy will only fire upon you if you threaten them.

Do you sit around and build a fort in your basement to keep any and all ants out every day? What lengths do you go to in order to ensure no squirrels occupy any of your property?

Do you see what I'm getting at? Those ants don't really threaten you and neither do the squirrels… so you just ignore them, right?

If JFK Jr was nothing worth talking about, why would they care at all to discredit things we say about the subject?

Again, only complete fools expend ammunition against non-threats.

>>11129903

>good answer

No, I'm saying no one murdered him. He died in old age in a whole different area out east.

>SO in this story we living now, POTUS is (kind of like) Jesus, They let Barbborus free (biden, clinton, etc.) while blaming Trump for all the bad?

Yeah, you're going a little too far out now.

Reel it back in, anon.

>>11129906

Anti-Christ is a midset or path.

Christ is a level of vibration and an alternative path.

The Anti-Christ(s) prevent Christ from reemerging.

>>11129964

But do you even know what Gnosis is, or do you just know you're not supposed to like people when someone else calls them a "gnostic" or attributes those ideas to them?

Further, what bearing does Jr being alive or dead have upon your future?

>>11129970

kek

How could you possibly be upset by those words?

>>11129973

No, brainlet…

The Beast is the thing the faggots are being tricked in to trying to summon.

The Ghost resides within The Machine and it's not exactly similar to The Beast.

>>11129988

Well…

>>11130009

Well of course. Most of us that aren't just normies came from /pol/…

I take it you're just new, fren.

>>11130019

>Im assuming this is due to the rebirth?

No, he just wasn't ever killed. [They] literally just lied so you wouldn't learn more about him.

>They just don't want to admit that POTUS really is trying to ENLIGHTEN the masses/herd/sheep

Well, in that sense, of course.

I would call him a prophet instead though.

>>11130021 Anon explains our aim - to get normies to DYOR

notable

>>11130031

You seem unnecessarily attached to this position, anon.

What threatens you about the people Catholics don't like?…

Why must knowledge be centralized? What if knowledge belonged to all of us and the way to access it was simply ignoring everyone else and trusting only yourself?

>>11130063

How do either of those things adequately describe the words I've used?…

You seem a bit off kilter, anon.

>>11130064

If you don't spend every waking day relentlessly challenging your own ideas and especially ideas of others, then you're wasting time pretending you're "awake".

Well said, anon.

>>11130114

This is your opportunity to explain why I'm wrong. You can waste it on padding your own ego, or you can spread Truth where you think only deceit resides.

The choice is yours.

>>11130148

Thanks for dong what most of us are too lazy to do, anon.

>>11130178

>hung from a tree

so, you've got hanged man and an Odin reference tied in to one.

Either way, it wasn't a "cross". Whatever he was (seemingly temporarily) hung from or nailed to was just a tree, it appears.

But, he, I'm just some guy. I'm not pretending to be omniscient or anything.

>>11130204

I'm genuinely not following, anon…

Methinks you're just a confused normie.

Have a nice day, normie.

>>11130212

Except that the Old Testament and the New Testament are told from opposing perspectives.

>>11130246

I think Kazakhstan came up last night… but I don't remember why.

Pandora's box definitely did though…

Interesting, boss.

>>11130354

The cross is the trinity.

I feel like you're squeezing me, anon.

I'd prefer to think that you're just curious and if you are, that's great. But, it really feels like you're stringing me along.

>>11130369

I don't think I'm being selfish (assuming that's what you meant).

I think we just have differing perspectives, which is only really healthy and a good sign at that; considering that us being copies of each other would be very scary.

Anyway, Q posed the question a while back: "Does Satan exist?" and also "Does the idea of Satan exist?"

I think the correct answers are "no" and "yes" respectively.

There is a ghost in the machine though, anon. It's not "The Beast" either.

I don't mind if you disagree.