I took a look at the responses to POTUS Tweet and something is off! All of the latest replies at the time of this writing are very very anti-POTUS. Not the way it used to be. It used to be masses of the pro-POTUS "silent majority" replying. We used to dominate the replies. Not sure if this is now because Twitter booted so many people, myself included (doubtful), or because Twitter is engaged in election interference/propaganda push by pushing anti-POTUS Tweets to the top. Seems pretty clear to me it's the latter.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1317544845251063809

RULE OF LAW

>>11131533

Was just thinking about that tonight. I can not wait for the sun to rise over the horizon after this war. It's going to be a kind of glorious we can not imagine at the moment. No frame of reference.

Time to introduce the "real" "planned" candidate now? Biden is toast. MO

>>11131697

Very interdasting. Hmmmm

>>11131781

Fascinating. Gonna be a great show watching the news unlock.

>>11131815

I believe Q is differentiating for the record. Think MSM attacks; they work comments/theories Anons/Normies make and then try to link those in their fake news, leading the public to believe that "Q" has stated those things. There is Q who makes the official posts. Then there are all the other digital soldiers, anons, whoever who come up with theories. Important to distinguish between the two for the record and for the public.

>>11131955

Agreed anon. Nice work.