>>11130733 pb Q

 

Well first of all I Know that I can safely assume you know the answer to your Questions.

 

>How do you inform your target(s) ['business partners'] what you have?

 

You show them. Pretty simple. Send them the content and say ok you do what I want and I won’t release this. Blackmail.

 

>Why would H. Biden have such material on his laptop?

 

Morbid fascination? Placed there without his knowledge? Self-destructive tendencies due to childhood abuse?

 

>How was the content originally received?

Email?

 

My best guess is that someone put it there without his knowledge. Previously posted pics imply he was passed out cold from drug use and it’s easy to assume that he could be compromised this way allowing opportunity to plant the info.

 

the crack pipe pic could have been staged indicating a honey pot type operation?

 

>Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?]

>On purpose [years of being treated poorly by 'Pop'] or simple negligence?

 

Plant the info, plant a virus, computer malfunctions and is taken in for tech support without knowing what’s on it.

 

>If such information existed on laptop why wouldn't contents be claimed?

 

See above

 

>Several attempts made to contact to claim?

 

Tech wants to get paid

 

>Messages left?

 

?

 

>Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim knowing the contents on the drive could bury Pops & family.

>A troubled life?

>A troubled family?

>Looks can be deceiving.

>Q

 

It’s clear that he is a troubled and conflicted soul and though I have compassion for him because of this I can not and will not defend the alleged abuse he inflicted on others. I haven’t seen the videos but know that you have to be severely compromised to engage in these acts and I will suppose that this is due to severe childhood abuse and that he was not completely ‘assimilated’ [like Hillary].

 

My question:

 

Why did tech look? As a past IT support tech I would not have. Invasion of privacy thing. Although if past the 90 days WRT the contract why wouldn’t he look.

 

It’s all so convenient though right?

 

I Think I see what you’re getting at here. I just read someone else's comment about mutually assured destruction. A lose-lose situation. Someone didn’t get what they paid for?

 

That means we’re winning.