Anonymous ID: 1318e1 Oct. 18, 2020, 5:12 a.m. No.11134134   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11134124

in a meme, I agree. It's it.

making someone aware of their nitpicking . . . .what do you call that?

counter-shill?

counter-bitch?

ah, you call it 'being real.'

 

for memes it's true that grammar is important, or in review of intentional mistakes in a message that seems to be a 'comm' . . .

but the method of the grammar khat is automated nitpicking.

and often it gets it wrong.

PS: 'nice' isn't always a virtue.

Anonymous ID: 1318e1 Oct. 18, 2020, 5:16 a.m. No.11134156   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11134143

just because it rhymes doesn't make it true.

and they could be 'real' but just having had a lapse.

but to brag about tatoos . . . isn't really something that tradtionally Jewish people would do . . .

Anonymous ID: 1318e1 Oct. 18, 2020, 5:29 a.m. No.11134257   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4268 >>4295

>>11134226

?

so it's OK to correct spelling and grammar in a knee jerk fashion to you or not?

what you do here is make basically a nonrelated statement.

and it seems to be in the form of 'bigotry'

so I'm not going to do the 'grammar' thing but I'll do the 'cultural appropriate' thing.

we're in a free speech rapid fire venue where quick fingers produce copious copy on machines and systems that might bog . . . and compromise the method.

so errors happen.

and you make a bland incitement by saying what you, no real idea what you mean or who you are talking about.

what that is called it 'baiting people' or 'trolling'.

and that would indictate you're either an annoyance shill or someone who hasn't woken up (in the morning) and had your coffee yet.

 

so you statement of bland bigoted accusation . . . flops like a fish.

your point waz?

 

please clarify your bland statement of bland bigoted accusation . . .