tyb
new Dan?
dis?
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1317727930814922754
https://twitter.com/i/status/1317727930814922754
We love you POTUSfag, no homo!
and we love you too bakerfag, totally homo! kek
Trump's refusal to disavow QAnon is part of his pattern of
encouraging hate for political gain
From Charlottesville to the Proud Boys to QAnon, the president simply won't denounce anyone who supports him. It's a dangerous habit.
Oct. 18, 2020, 6:43 AM EDT
By Halie Soifer, executive director, Jewish Democratic Council of America
For the second time in less than three weeks, President Donald Trump refused to condemn right-wing extremism when asked and instead legitimized its dangerous vitriol and hate.
This time, when asked at NBC News’ presidential townhall on Thursday if he would disavow the QAnon group and its false conspiracy theory that “Democrats are a satanic pedophile ring and that [he is] a savior of that,” Trump responded with the implausible assertion that he knew nothing about the movement and then immediately undercut his own claim by vacuously stating QAnon’s followers are “very much against pedophilia.” This is as ignorant and dangerous as saying white supremacists are “very much against people with bad genes.”
By normalizing, accepting and repeating a conspiracy theory’s core, false tenet as a fact and reason to sympathize with them, the president of the United States legitimized domestic terrorism and hatred — and it’s not the first time. This QAnon exchange came shortly after Trump refused to denounce white supremacy when asked at the first presidential debate. And then, when pointedly asked to disavow the Proud Boys — another right-wing extremist group aligned with white supremacists that promotes “Western chauvinism” — Trump instead issued a call to arms by encouraging the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.”
Under immense public pressure after the debate, including from Fox News, he walked back his remarks two days later but the damage was done. Both of Trump’s statements had been immediately embraced by extremist groups as signs of solidarity and alignment. After the first debate, the Proud Boys changed their logo and began selling merchandise echoing the president; QAnon followers celebrated the what Trump offered as “the biggest pitch for QAnon ever seen.”
MORE AT LINK:
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-s-refusal-disavow-qanon-part-his-pattern-encouraging-hate-ncna1243828
one time, at Q camp, after posting a drop on fakebook that had a huge list of media links to articles about Qanon and since Fakebook breaks the links into their own mini hyper links, when I copied them to here from FB none of them worked. I was all freaked out like GUISE GUISE! THE MEDIA HAS KILLED ALL OF THOSE NEWS STORIES! and other anons joined in as freaked out as I was until a cooler head noted that the links were still working if you click them from the original Q post and then I went straight to tard jail and didn't say another word for at least a week… good times! kek
The Hunter Biden email story: Could this mean the end of those internet oligopolies? | Mulshine
Today 6:25 AM
By Paul Mulshine | Star-Ledger Columnist
“The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for or a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.”
That’s an excerpt from Section 230, the part of the federal code that regulates the internet.
Back in 1996, when it was passed by Congress as part of the Communications Decency Act, Section 230 gave internet services legal protections unavailable to mere newspapers like The Star-Ledger.
If a newspaper were to print something libelous, the publisher could be sued. But under Section 230 "No provider or user of an interactive computer services shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
The idea was that the few such services then in existence – remember Compuserve and Prodigy? – were virtual bulletin boards on which information could be exchanged between willing parties.
Then along came the giants like Facebook and Twitter. Before long they had audiences so massive that they elbowed us inkstained wretches into the shadows, where we labor to this day providing them with content for which they pay not a penny.
That’s bad enough. Worse their owners have decided to take over the role of deciding which newspaper stories are fit for the public to read and relay on their platforms.
In the case of those New York Post stories on the Hunter Biden emails released last week, the owners of Twitter and Facebook argue that the stories won’t be linked because they may have been obtained by hacking.
But journalists frequently run articles based on information acquired through actions that are illegal. Have some inside information you’d like to leak to me? No matter how you got it, please drop me a line.
The other objection is that the emails may be fake. I discussed that the other day with Eugene Volokh, the noted UCLA law professor who runs the “Volokh Conspiracy” blog on constitutional law.
Volokh drew a comparison to the 2004 controversy that cost Dan Rather his job at CBS.
Two months before the election in which President George W. Bush ran for re-election, Rather gave a report on some copies of documents obtained by the network that purported to show some inconsistencies in Bush’s story about his service in the Air National Guard.
The Bush camp raised questions about the documents' authenticity, but that didn’t stop the media outlets from covering the story.
They weren’t doing CBS any favors. When critics brought up technical flaws in the documents, Rather was forced into early retirement over his protests.
Similarly, if it turns out these emails are forgeries, then the people at the Post will have been exposed as credulous boobs.
But that sort of thing used to be sorted out in what was known as “the marketplace of ideas.”
Volokh, who’s been following online issues since the advent of the internet, said we’ve come a long way since the days of websites that functioned as mere bulletin boards.
In this case there’s a question of whether the online executives are inserting their political views into their roles.
“If it really does look like provable bias, then I think one reaction is to say ‘Who do these people think they are?’” he said. “We didn’t think we were setting them up as the newspaper of record, but they got so powerful they are now trying to tell elected officials and newspapers what they should do.”
Journalists and politicians are free to ignore such orders, of course. But there’s an irony here for conservatives, he said. Those of us on the right side of the ledger believe in private property, and both Facebook and Twitter are the property of their owners, not the public.
MORE AT LINK:
https://www.nj.com/opinion/2020/10/the-hunter-biden-email-story-could-this-mean-the-end-of-those-internet-oligopolies-mulshine.html
memographix…
I feel sorry most of the time yet it seemed like someone had to tell the truth and so few were stepping up because "Religion".
Everyone is so angry at politicians yet most of us know not to trust politicians.
Those we were taught to trust the most…
I feel a counter narrative was in place here when I walked through the door yet I will be damned if I allow the deeper darker truths to be suppressed and glossed over, especially now.
Punish the demons yet allow the Devil to run amuck?
Not on my watch.
Live updates: Hunter Biden’s alleged emails become a
campaign issue
OCTOBER 18, 2020 BY 1
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff on Friday described revelations from a slew of emails in a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden as being part of a Russia-backed smear campaign.
“We know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin,” Schiff said on CNN. “That’s been clear for well over a year now that they’ve been pushing this false narrative about this vice president and his son.”
The California Democrat was responding to questions about the origins of emails that were found on a laptop purported to belong to the son of Democratic nominee, as first reported by the New York Post.
https://foxwilmington.com/headlines/live-updates-hunter-bidens-alleged-emails-become-a-campaign-issue/
No doubt about it.
I was torn initially because any "fame/infamy" I seemed to be gathering early on was truly just so my frens and fam would take this shit seriously.
Tough very jaded crowd so it took quite a bit of convincing before any of them would lend me their ear. It did not help that I have been red pilling them for decades prior so they are sort of immune to my brand of "crazy".
I am proud of just about everything I have done here and I long for the day when we can all share those experiences with attached identities yet for now, ANON it is!
and here is one reason why you should not name fag kek
1: assassins creed is bent and twisted revisionist history
2: isn't it odd that people read the Bloodlines of the Illuminati because the CIA wanted them to read it and paytrixxx ran with the P = Payseur like Fritz was Jesus… Yet I do not see everyone converting to Theosophy! kek
stop teasin' ! kek
I think I like you.
Who am I? Is this me? Am I one? Or Thirteen?
and
6 protons 6 neutrons 6 electrons = carbon 12
It's what life craves!
Fear no Evil
The Bible says that God will bring Heaven to Earth and I am down with that part.
Don't yell at me! kek