you don't understand the story.
she triggers you, huh?
it's easier to love her and pray for her, and understand that she was troubled and tried to reach out . . . for help . . . but no one did help her.
whatever, you're the one who looks like the troll who wants to cause problems by hating on her.
She's really kind of cool if you ever bothered to learn what she was doing.
you have a single sentence.
there are three nouns.
none of them indicate who the 'he' is.
what did you mean?
enviously you wish I had.
listen, it's too obvious.
even Rommel meme agrees with a checkem.
middle of the night Q with a serious boom
"Those who provided Hunter w/ . . . "
Report that, MSM!
It's important. If they really believe that Q is an 'enemy' , ought not the public know what the enemy is saying?
They know Q is not an enemy. That is why they dare not quote Q.
if they want any credibility at all they should hang on every Q drop and post them immedately on their forward facing pages to 'expose the evil' and wouldn't that just take the air right out of the Q movement? (if they could think they would think like this?).
but they will not quote Q on the front page of the NYT. That would maybe save them.
but they don't really want to be saved.
It's a crash and burn for the MSM, it was designed to all go away just as we became aware that, yes, we had already been invaded . . .
(or is this all just a fiction?)
you are situationally unaware.
the irony that you perhaps intend just fails in this venue, anon.
you'd better state it clearly that you are making an 'ironic statement' as if hearing someone else or . . .
the other anon who already tagged you has a point.
if you promote the 'greatest commandment' you don't do a 'channel the demon' bit while doing it, do you, if you want to be taken seriously.
the unironic interpretation is all that the 'enforcers' will see.
make your ethos clearer, anon. the irony that you pretend is lost in the fog of war.