>>1114013

He works for the FAT MAN. DO NOT TRUST.

We have Q - no need to play infowars disinfo roulette these days.

>>1114123

RUDY RUDY RUDY!!!

God Bless POTUS, Flynn, Rogers, and his 200 million supporters. In JESUS name!

>>1114145

Shill will be shills. We don't know who's who, but you can bet Q team has a very good idea!

>>1114112

Hannity has more integrity in his little finger than Alex Jones has in his whole big fat torso.

If you already follow Q and listen to Hannity, why would you ever subject yourself to that 2-bit nutjob?

>>1114163

We are seeing the power of the holy spirit. Trump is a sinner. His inner circle is sinners. Hell, even David was a fornicator and sinner.

But when God gives you a job to do… YOU DO IT.

>>1114325

Interesting. >>1114392

The softer side of Deep State Desperation.

Let 'em legalize, they're still gonna lose. I'm gonna write Chuck Schumer's name on a joint right now and put it aside. I will smoke it all the way down after we clean their clocks in November.

Apr 19 2018 17:54:59

Q

!xowAT4Z3VQ

1105115

>>1105041

We have everything.

How can we use what we know?

How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

What are you witnessing unfold?

Trust the plan.

Q

————————-

How does this work? Obviously Q team has some evidence that may not be admissible yet. How does evidence become admissible? I'm asking because I don't really understand how we're supposed to help in this area - Q has brought this up before, but I didn't quite get it. I guess I figured smarter people would get it done, but here we are again. Are we supposed to somehow get things into the public domain? How?

I read this to try to educate myself: https:// www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/what-is-admissible-evidence.html

>>1105115

>>1114736

Reading this now:

https:// www.justice.gov/archive/oip/courtdecisions/public-domain.html

Legal anons, please help, this is above my pay rate. How do we help Q and POTUS use the evidence they have? This seems extremely important!