We'd be better off with a King.
>doesn't have to yield to short-sighted political pressures
>entire political agendas, and diplomatic relationships, don't change every 4 years
>related; long-term, multi-decade, century-long goals can be set and achieved
>having King won't induce political polarization, because of two party system
>politicians need to go into debt to achieve power (money, favors), but Kings don't. Kings are insulated from outside influence.
The problem is that in our world, virtually everyone in powerful positions are Satanic pedophiles. We need to somehow ensure that our King is righteous, like Trump or Barron.
Also, a King isn't a politician that you elect forever. A king claims lineage with something divine, but like Elron said, the blood of man is all but spent.