ty anon and baker - good teamwork!
Agreed, working hard. Others can bake if they stand up to do so.
Notables aren't looking so filtered.
Still issues with single ID's spamming Headlines for the aggregators, but we all need to work together on that, baker can't always see trends by an ID when bred moving quickly.
>MSM is calling the Hunter Biden laptop story "a QAnon conspiracy theory".
Sauce for that? Just haven't seen it yet, only the Russian angle.
Now, this could work in our favor.
1) more eyes on QAnon
2) As it's proven to be legit, it actually then legitimizes "QAnon" - which doesn't exist, but run with it; and
3) that in turn causes peeps to as "What else are they onto that MSM is lying about??"
I like you're new eyepatch, your the best GF!!
>Real bread is here
STFU. THIS is the real bred. The other has 90 posts, 20 of which are the RedHead baker.
RedHead anon has been along for the ride for a LONG time, and may even be a shady persona, who knows.
FAIL over there!
24 UIDs in other bred, 114 here. Please faggots, just let that loaf die and get deleted.
Completely agree anon!
What I'm talking about, is one UID that posts mebbe 20+ "news" articles with headline, text and a link.
Then Baker picks up 10-15 of those from that one ID for the notables.
And, none of those were even Nom'd or even commented on by any real anons.
But anyway, point was that's hard to detect and "run an anons card" by searching all their posts to see that trend.
HERE is an example, in this bred. Are anons ok with this??
UID: bb7ada
^^^ 4 posts, all picked up by Baker, not a single Nom or Anon comment.
That'sINJECTION
Baker working with another anon in tandem to put stuff in the notes.
Can call it "Baker Prerogative", but is it maybe something MOAR?? Seems suspicious to this anon.
Would someone Nom this post asnotableand see if it's included, calling out a trend?
Anons, not causing drama, just pointing this out, leave it if not relevant:
>So you're against /warroom/ now?
>Do you even read notables?
I do read them, usually first.
Also see the hard work that goes into baking.
But, it seems Notables should be sourced collectively byanons, as that is what aggregators pick up and the "outside world" sees.
They don't follow within breds, nor recognize which baker has bakes and use that in their judgement of notable assessment.
Also, I don't at all see you, AnimeAnon as the same as OSS.
Two different "agendas" in play.
OSS was more about handing the bakes back to anons.
And I don't want to get into the middle of a WarRoom / Comms debacle, enough of that shit.
Tend to agree, but "agendas" are a slippery slope.
And even you draw the line at not adding to "Global Notables" in a bake, willy nilly:
>The baker's personal interpretation of a Q post is not suitable material for Global Announcements.
and recognize your teamwork in fixing the dough when a baker edits it, such as the offsite links corrected in this bred, which I called out as a good thing.
>By creating fake drama and then posting own crumbs into notables and then globals.
Have an issue with Global additions as well anon.
I see you are PF anon, and may even be associated with the "comms crew", dunno. Don't want to get into it, and don't really care - focused more on outcomes.
Think your point about OSS going too far is well taken.
>I definitely stay here.
Me as well FrenchAnon, warts and all, nothing is perfect. Good afternoon to you, good luck with learning to bake, see ya on NightShift hopefully.