We need to put out charts measuring kids rescued before Q and kids rescued after Q.
Maybe include pedo arrests too.
That’ll refute these “hurting the child trafficking movement”
Beveled mirror edge
Thanks anon, I was just 1 off!
I think it would be pertinent to use an “approved” source for data that the MSM would have to attack to disprove.
This article >https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/viral-chart-distorts-human-trafficking-statistics/
While it’s annoying how they try to put us down, I think we just need to make our data “bulletproof”.
Maybe Doj press releases or some arrest database on a .gov site.
Just ideas.
We need to put out charts measuring kids rescued before Q and kids rescued after Q.
Maybe include pedo arrests too.
That’ll refute these “hurting the child trafficking movement”
Grrr why did it repost old message? Must be getting hit again….
Thanks anon, I was just 1 off!
I think it would be pertinent to use an “approved” source for data that the MSM would have to attack to disprove.
This article >https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/viral-chart-distorts-human-trafficking-statistics/
While it’s annoying how they try to put us down, I think we just need to make our data “bulletproof”.
Maybe Doj press releases or some arrest database on a .gov site.
Just ideas.
Instead of arrests though # of children rescue vs # of children missing??
With oct/nov 2017 being a prominent marker “when Q showed up”
So transparent right ?
They need a better random name generator if they want us to believe it to be organic.
I’ll see what I can find, keep eyes open over next bread or two