>>11151650 (lb)
Had she started her period?
Was she compelled?
How do we know?
By what standard was it rape?
Statutory?
What was the statute?
How old is childbearing age?
What is a man's goal if not to have raise a family?
What is a woman's goal if not to help a man raise a family?
Who can best produce?
Who can best provide?
Is religion or the legal system, either one, an institution of logic?
Just questions…lots of dogma fogs the battlefield. Makes foes of ghosts.
Ethnocentrism is blinding
Both men and women in different ways. Women are programmed to believe men will hurt them if they don't comply and men are trained to believe they won't get love or sex if they don't comply.
Both are set against each other in a power struggle. It's sick really.
The word pedophilia in was unknown in human language until about 1900 AD.
It was invented by a German (noted creators of scat pron) Psychologist. Everything you think you know about sex, the law, mental health , etc, is from this guy's theories. Guess God died around 1820 and came back to life as this guy.
Krafft-Ebing was born in 1840 in Mannheim, Germany, studied medicine at the University of Heidelberg, where he specialized in psychiatry. He later practiced in psychiatric asylums. After leaving his work in asylums, he pursued a career in psychiatry, forensics, and hypnosis.
He died in Graz in 1902. He was recognized as an authority on deviant sexual behavior and its medicolegal aspect
Krafft-Ebing considered procreation the purpose of sexual desire and that any form of recreational sex was a perversion of the sex drive. "With opportunity for the natural satisfaction of the sexual instinct, every expression of it that does not correspond with the purpose of nature—i.e., propagation,—must be regarded as perverse."[10] Hence, he concluded that homosexuals suffered a degree of sexual perversion because homosexual practices could not result in procreation. In some cases, homosexual libido was classified as a moral vice induced by the early practice of masturbation.[11] Krafft-Ebing proposed a theory of homosexuality as biologically anomalous and originating in the embryonic and fetal stages of gestation, which evolved into a "sexual inversion" of the brain. In 1901, in an article in the Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen (Yearbook for Intermediate Sexual Types), he changed the biological term from anomaly to differentiation.
Although the primary focus is on sexual behavior in men, there are sections on Sadism in Woman, Masochism in Woman, and Lesbian Love. Several of the cases of sexual activity with children were committed by women.
Krafft-Ebing’s conclusions about homosexuality are now largely forgotten, partly because Sigmund Freud’s theories were more interesting to physicians (who considered homosexuality to be a psychological problem) and partly because he incurred the enmity of the Austrian Catholic Church when he psychologically associated martyrdom (a desire for sanctity) with hysteria and masochism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Krafft-Ebing
pedophilia (n.)
1900, "abnormal, especially sexual, love of young children," from pedo- (from Greek pais (genitive paidos) "child") + Greek philos "loving" (see -phile). First attested in an abstract of a report by Krafft-Ebing.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/pedophilia
We are divided by our sex roles though?
And our marital roles.
Everything is hierarchical, because we were raised in a hierarchy. We can't see the forest for the trees.
Sons must respect fathers, even if he's a worthless son of a bitch. Lord said so.
Sons must respect mothers, even if she's a lying cheating whore. Lord said so.
Fathers must take out the trash if he doesn't no one will.
Wife runs off, takes the kids and half of Dad's shit, and half his pay for years to come.
Simple roles really.
Can you see them?
Or, it's a manufactured disease and a bullet to the head is a final solution?
Even in this bastion of freedom of speech mentioning the topic it is akin to posting a video of torturing and eating children, which is disgusting and brutal and I could never condone under any circumstances. But, we can't even talk about the real enemy, because we are busy dealing with these artificial epidemics and our freedom to speak on those is absolutely controlled by the dialectic of our society. Anyone that violates the dialectic gets Id'd for potential termination.
We are slaves to the same power. Maybe the Jews had their freedom for a little bit, like the pioneers, but we all got swept back onto the slave plantation. Not by choice.
Right, in ancient greek boys and girls didn't have sex. That's how society perpetuated back then, through boys's buttholes.
You're going with that?
Or, possibly it was so fucking normal for boys and girls to have sex that there were no Nazis yet who had decided is was a crime?
You're saying it was so rare and unheard of that the Greek didn't think to invent a word for it until after their language died and a German 'coined' the term in the 1800s?
King John let the Jews into England in 1201 and they brought their marriage laws with them. These were melded into society and we use them to execute people for violating the age of consent statues today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1200s_in_England
In traditional societies, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman, and pubic hair for a man.[3]
Reliable data for ages at marriage is scarce. In England, for example, the only reliable data in the early modern period comes from property records made after death. Not only were the records relatively rare, but not all bothered to record the participants' ages, and it seems that the more complete the records are, the more likely they are to reveal young marriages. Modern historians have sometimes shown reluctance to accept evidence of young ages of marriage, dismissing it as a 'misreading' by a later copier of the records.[3]
In the 12th century, Gratian, the influential founder of canon law in medieval Europe, accepted the age of puberty for marriage (not sex) to be around twelve for girls and around fourteen for boys but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if both children were older than seven years of age.[4][ This is directly from the ashkenaz influence] There were authorities that said that such consent for entering marriage could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage. Judges sometimes honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than seven: in contrast to established canon, there are recorded marriages of two- and three-year-olds.[3]
The first recorded age-of-consent law dates from 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[5]
The American colonies followed the English tradition, and the law was more of a guide. For example, Mary Hathaway (Virginia, 1689) was only nine when she was married to William Williams.[6] Sir Edward Coke "made it clear that the marriage of girls under 12 was normal, and the age at which a girl who was a wife was eligible for a dower from her husband's estate was 9 even though her husband be only four years old."[3]
In the 16th century, a small number of Italian and German states set the minimum age for sexual intercourse for girls, setting it at twelve years. Towards the end of the 18th century, other European countries also began to enact similar laws. The first French Constitution of 1791 established the minimum age at eleven years. Portugal, Spain, Denmark and the Swiss cantons initially set the minimum age at ten to twelve years.[7]
Age of consent laws were, historically, difficult to follow and enforce: legal norms based on age were not, in general, common until the 19th century, because clear proof of exact age and precise date of birth were often unavailable.[7]
In Australia, 18th century thought was that children were inherently sinful and vulnerable to sexual temptations. Punishment for "giving in" to these temptations was generally left to parents and was not seen as a government matter, except in the case of rape.[8] Australian children had few rights and were legally considered the chattel of their parents.[8] From the late 18th century, and especially in the 19th century, attitudes started to change. By the mid-19th century there was increased concern over child sexual abuse.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
This is code.
666 is the number of talents of gold King Solomon's slaves brought him out of his mines.
666 = Taxes = The Number of the Beast
King (who takes the taxes) = The Beast
Slavery to the system.
Per capita taxes just for breathing
Taxed ship (our body)
Taxed castle (our home)
Taxed garden
Taxed temple
Taxed labor
Numbering men, recording them and extracting money from them by force is criminal.
Just like "pedo".
Point your finger at someone and call them a pedo, and you're likely to get them killed.
The actual definitions of criminal behavior don't matter when you're dealing with emotions and religion is all emotion. Religious crimes are easy to accuse and hard to clear one's name from. The scarlet letter.
The source of so much drama in our society is litigation. Litigation creates case law. Case law allows judges and criminals to change the way laws are enforced and.
The Pharisees are the OG lawyers. Jews. Experts at their craft and public administration…ie, running the Temple and collecting the taxes.
Who doesn't want to go down to the temple and get drunk celebrating the mutilation of a baby boy or the purchase of a bride?
This is what the Jews bring into each society they join. Their laws become societies laws through a perverted unjust lens.
Judges, Doctors, Professors…they all lie to protect the truth.
>https://twitter.com/MatthewTyrmand/status/1318041774447841281?s=19
It's just the one email posted there
Sup?
The wheel in the sky
The stars that revolve around the Northern Star as they rotate through the seasons.
It keeps on turning.
Yup. Symbolism shows us the past and the future.