>>11162357

>>11162390

What seems to not be understood is that archive sites DO NOT ARCHIVE FULL-SIZE IMAGES.

Taking out something out of the dough an anon worked very hard on, diligently, dutifully, faithfully is WRONG.

GMTanon has been doing this for a long time - like other anons with a task, he volunteered, took it upon himself to fill a need (previous graphic compilation guy stopped).

I don't get involved in baker or other personal dramas. I don't give a fuck whose feelz are hurt at what time for whatever reason - anons are here to fulfill the tasks that Q/Q+ set before us.

Personalities are irrelevant.

Preferences are irrelevant.

Personal convenience is irrelevant.

I don't care, neither does POTUS.

OUR COUNTRY AND THE WORLD ARE AT STAKE HERE

Tighten the fuck up and help or get out.

Fuck around and have bitchfights all you want, but don't take out resources that anon volunteers have produced for the overall effort.

No, I'm not GMT anon.

>>11162623

I am not C or anyone else, I'm anon only. I don't understand your reference and don't care all that much about it.

Anons who work hard to produce something, something Q said was important, should not have that something eliminated because of someone else's petty bitchfights.

>>11162624

>I'm not GMT anon

Please read that again and again, and actually the entire post several times until you get it.

It's not up to YOU to take out something that Q said was important.

>>11162680

https://web.archive.org/web/20201010090412/https://media.8kun.top/file_store/e9e26c9bcd2f95f8bad2e869426ebb9da9bd18df81a4c8f5e9f7411b15f0b3ea.jpg

You have to archive the actual image, it's not autoarchived on the archived page.

Why do you do this? Really?

I get there is a power issue with you, but why harm others?

I get that you feel powerful and like you are on a crusade against people you don't like (other bakers), but why harm anons?

I'm genuinely curious for a real answer.

>>11162728

>All that QMap crap is now is an artifact with dust and webs on it.

>It's relevance is negligible at best.

That is your opinion, and you are welcome to it but you don't speak for Q.

Q said it was very important and to keep it up.

At no point has Q ever said to stop making the graphic compilation(s).

Q has never said it is not suddenly irrelevant or only negligible relevance.

Not once.

Until Q says that, the graphic compilations should stay in.

>>11162824

How can you spread truth anon?

Can you make a podcast and share it?

Write a letter to the editor?

Make some memes or other graphics?

Take up a task (memes aren't being collected anymore, so that is a YUGE need that needs filling)

Find a need and fill it, whether it is here or in your neighborhood or family or church or whatever. Volunteer to be a poll-watcher or other task in elections.

There is a need somewhere, it just needs to be identified and you to jump in and do it.

>>11162761

I was not clear, I apologize.

There is obviously some serious BS going on.

I just choose not to involve myself personally or get involved directly one one 'side' or another.

The issue I am bringing up and my $0.0002 is about something Q said is important being removed from the dough due to the infighting.

I'm sick of seeing bitchfight posts in notables, the back & forth adding/removing from the dough, the hijacking the dough to add/remove things for personal reasons. It's like elementary school bs.

Those who choose to do a task, like baking or anything else should be mature enough to put the overall tasks Q gave us FIRST, put our freedom and country FIRST and rise above annoyance(s) or personalities.

The TASK comes first, do the goddamn task and stop injecting personalities and personal sensitivities and personal conflicts into it.

Just make a new thread, that's the ONLY task a baker has.

Q said the graphic compilations were very important. Leave them in the dough. That's my position.

>>11163069

Those are good ideas, sadly I'm not on any social media… hopefully other anons will see your ideas & request and help you with that!

Thank you for stepping up.

o7

>>11162875

Could you explain a bit for those of us who don't have tv and don't know who that is or the relevance?