>>11163087 lb

It seems to be all the links to the posts with the whole body of all the GMT graphic compilations. Those have been replaced with an archived page of that thread containing them. Considering that the archiving sites, waybackmachine included, do not automatically archive the full-sized images, anons who go to that link (now in the dough) would not get the full sized graphics, they will have to individually archive them.

Why do that to anons? Why not leave it with direct links to the posts with the graphics? Why make anons go through extra steps (anons have to archive them individually) to get them?

No anons asked for this to be done.

It doesn't make sense really.

>>11162852 lb

>I don't remember when Q said that.

>Please post a screen cap.

No problem.

>>11163197

More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all sorts of things on Hunter Biden's hdd that will put them in the slammer for life so they are trying to divert attention from it by using the old 'classic earmarks of a Russian information operation' ploy.”

FTFY

>>11163356

I have the ones that were in EST but don't have the ones in GMT (they were not removed before).

I should download all of them and also put them in an accessible gallery offline. The more accessible the better. The more copies in anons' and others' hands, the better.

Thank you, fellow archiver.

>>11163443

He is never wrong because he never, ever posts something he is not sure about. He's one of the few true journalists left.

With that said, I don't understand what he's saying really - was there another laptop that was dropped off somewhere? Or is he implying that Hunter did this to harm his "Pop"?

>>11163366

>>11163509

This is a very astute observation anon and a vitally important point.

>>11163420

I 'member you, anon, and I appreciate your service a lot. I can imagine how time-consuming it is, and if you are the one I'm thinking of, we did talk about that once.

>but if we could make proper use of a pinned on-board graphics bread while maintaining a high visibility link/explanation in the general bread dough, I think that could work.

Works for me and I think accessibility for anons is the most important thing.

>Problem is, I never saw a proper dialogue on a compromise to address it.

I did not either, it seems unilateral and unconcerned with what makes sense to everyone or what works for everyone.

I'm only concerned with accessibility for anons and maintaining the accuracy and completeness of archives.

>However, as a disclaimer, I'm not looking to step on anyone's toes kek.

I can't think anyone would take it that way - there's a need, and you'd be filling it, in service to anons and our tasks.

>>11163657

Why would you let petty irritations deter you from your participation in this historic effort?

We've had gore shill

cock-ball-torture-gore shill

scat-shill

loli-shills

blacked-shills

flat-earth shills

and all the rest.

And you didn't quit then!

>we can do some real digging, like old times

No one is stopping you from doing that right now. Step up, anon, it's not any worse than the last 3 years and the stakes are very high, as you know…

>>11163608

I see. I think that is what Q was implying the other night, too. See: >>11163489 ← which is absolutelyNOTABLE

>Would love to see Sperry's (or Q's, kek) sauce/proof for the assertion.

Many times I would like to see his source info, too. I'm not sure that will ever happen, but when Sperry posts something, I do know he's absolutely sure it's true.

>>11163876

>DOE

Oh yeah. The USgov is so YUGE and sprawling, some agencies/depts have a lot of crossover with others and intertwined projects. DoE works with DoD on a lot of things and have some shit to hide (not including their hazardous waste dumps they've made, those are public info).

Being right next to the Red Castle and its Chambers of Secrets is mighty handy for those secret projects involving old tech/info to (re)create and experiment on, no?