Anonymous ID: 816ecf Oct. 20, 2020, 3:27 a.m. No.11167224   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7402

Joe Biden criticises Donald Trump for renewed Fauci attack over

Covid

Martin Belam

Tue 20 Oct 2020 06.12 EDT

First published on Tue 20 Oct 2020 03.58 EDT

11m ago

New York Times poll gives Biden nine point national lead over Trump

Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin report for the New York Times on their latest New York Times/Siena College poll, and it does not make for happy reading for the Trump campaign. Nationally Joe Biden holds a nine point lead over the president. They write:

 

With just two weeks left in the campaign, Trump does not hold an edge on any of the most pressing issues at stake in the election, leaving him with little room for a political recovery absent a calamitous misstep by Biden, the Democratic nominee, in the coming days. The president has even lost his longstanding advantage on economic matters: Voters are now evenly split on whether they have more trust in him or Biden to manage the economy. On all other subjects tested in the poll, voters preferred Biden over Trump by modest or wide margins.

 

Over all, Biden is backed by 50 percent of likely voters, the poll showed, compared with 41 percent for Trump and 3 percent divided among other candidates.

 

Most of all, the survey makes clear that crucial constituencies are poised to reject Trump because they cannot abide his conduct, including 56 percent of women and 53 percent of white voters with college degrees who said they had a very unfavorable impression of Trump — an extraordinary level of antipathy toward an incumbent president.

 

The New York Times says the margin of error for the poll, which was conducted from 15 October to 18 October, was 3.4 percentage points.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2020/oct/20/donald-trump-joe-biden-us-elections-debate-coronavirus-covid-19-fauci-live-updates

Anonymous ID: 816ecf Oct. 20, 2020, 3:32 a.m. No.11167262   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7402

Why the U.S. Navy Needs a Stealth Battleship to Take on China

It could be stealthy, heavily armored, and armed with high-tech weapons.

October 20, 2020

by John Rossomando

 

Anew kind of capital ship, a battleship for the twenty-first-century, could be needed to counter the increasing threat from China’s naval buildup. It could be a centerpiece of Secretary of Defense Mike Esper’s proposed 500-ship navy, operating in conjunction with a proposed fleet of autonomous missile ships. China’s strategy requires a rethink of twenty-first-century naval warfare.

 

Chinese anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles make operating inside the first island chain that goes from Japan in the north to the Philippines in the south hazardous. While carriers are unlikely to become obsolete anytime soon, such considerations hamper their utility. Fleet design should account for the threats posed by the likely enemy.

 

By 2035, China could boast the world’s largest navy by tonnage and become a dominant force in the vital East China Sea and South China Sea waterways. This buildup gives China additional leverage over the estimated $5.3 trillion worth of commercial shipping passing through these sea lanes annually.

 

Carrier air wings could be forced to launch attacks from more than 1,000 nautical miles away due to the increased threat from anti-ship missile batteries, a 2019 study by the Center for Strategic and Budget Analysis (CSBA) found, putting them at their maximum operational range.

 

The U.S. needs a viable first-strike weapon system to clear the way for carrier battlegroups to operate with reduced threat from shore or seaborne missile batteries, such as that posed by any engagement with China.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-us-navy-needs-stealth-battleship-take-china-171003

Anonymous ID: 816ecf Oct. 20, 2020, 3:39 a.m. No.11167345   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7373 >>7402 >>7406 >>7468 >>7517

More Than 50 Former Intel Officials Say Hunter Biden Smear Smells

Like Russia

“If we are right,” the group wrote in a letter, “this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote.”

headshot

By Nick Visser

10/20/2020 05:38 am ET

 

A coalition of former intelligence officials issued a joint letter condemning a recent smear campaign against Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, saying it appeared to have the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign meant to influence the upcoming election.

 

The group includes former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former CIA directors Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta and John Brennan, and dozens of other former deputy directors and senior officials of American intelligence agencies.

 

“Each of us believes deeply that American citizens should determine the outcome of elections, not foreign governments,” the group wrote in a letter first obtained by Politico. “It is for all these reasons that we write to say that the arrival on the U.S. political scene of emails purportedly belonging to [former] Vice President Biden’s son Hunter, much of it related to his time serving on the Board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

 

“If we are right,” they continued, “this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this.”

 

The group notes they do not know if the purported emails published by the New York Post are genuine and they do not have concrete evidence if they are a Russian disinformation campaign, but their “expertise makes us deeply suspicious.”

 

Politico notes several signatories have publicly endorsed Biden’s campaign, although they have worked under presidents from both parties, including Trump.

 

The so-called revelations against Hunter Biden were first published by the New York Post last week, which described them as a “smoking-gun email” on its front page. The publication’s story claims Hunter Biden took a damaged laptop to a repair store in Delaware but never returned. Contents of the laptop later found their way into the hands of an attorney for Rudy Giuliani, who gave it to the newspaper.

 

The device, the Post added, contained an email linking the former vice president to his son’s business dealings.

 

Republicans, namely President Donald Trump, have latched on to Hunter Biden’s work on the board of a Ukrainian energy company as a political attack, although is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden.

 

Questions about the Post’s story arose almost immediately, and The New York Times wrote Sunday several of the reporters on the story had refused to put their bylines on it. Biden’s campaign said at the time it couldn’t comment on the allegations in the piece as the Post hadn’t reached out about “critical elements” in the story, although a spokesperson told Politico: “Joe Biden carried out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and engaged in no wrongdoing.”

 

The Associated Press reported last week the FBI was investigating if the emails published by the Post were connected to a Russian disinformation campaign. The bureau declined to comment to the publication, but the report prompted the former intelligence officials to say their concern was widespread throughout Washington.

 

“We do not know whether these press reports are accurate, but they do suggest concern within Executive Branch departments and agencies that mirrors ours,” they wrote. “It is high time that Russia stops interfering in our democracy.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hunter-biden-intel-officials-russia

^^^base link because tracking, look and you will find it^^^

Well no shit, Karen, its the deep state Huffington Post!

How do you plan on countering their narrative is you do not

know what it is, Karen?

Are you concerned, Karen?

K K

E

K K