Anonymous ID: ec69c7 Oct. 20, 2020, 6:13 a.m. No.11168896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9284

>>11168776 (lb)

All this pedophilia leads back to a German Psychiatrist named Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing. He's credited with coining the idea and the term in 1900 AD. I wonder if he was a Muslim, a Catholic, or a Jew? Any sexual activity that isn't intended to produce a child is evil according to this guy. We gotta lock up and treat people who would do the sex for enjoyment.

 

Krafft-Ebing considered procreation the purpose of sexual desire and that any form of recreational sex was a perversion of the sex drive. "With opportunity for the natural satisfaction of the sexual instinct, every expression of it that does not correspond with the purpose of nature—i.e., propagation,—must be regarded as perverse."[10] Hence, he concluded that homosexuals suffered a degree of sexual perversion because homosexual practices could not result in procreation. In some cases, homosexual libido was classified as a moral vice induced by the early practice of masturbation.[11] Krafft-Ebing proposed a theory of homosexuality as biologically anomalous and originating in the embryonic and fetal stages of gestation, which evolved into a "sexual inversion" of the brain. In 1901, in an article in the Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen (Yearbook for Intermediate Sexual Types), he changed the biological term from anomaly to differentiation.

 

Although the primary focus is on sexual behavior in men, there are sections on Sadism in Woman, Masochism in Woman, and Lesbian Love. Several of the cases of sexual activity with children were committed by women.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Krafft-Ebing

 

pedophilia (n.)

 

1900, "abnormal, especially sexual, love of young children," from pedo- (from Greek pais (genitive paidos) "child") + Greek philos "loving" (see -phile). First attested in an abstract of a report by Krafft-Ebing.

 

https://www.etymonline.com/word/pedophilia

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Krafft-Ebing

Anonymous ID: ec69c7 Oct. 20, 2020, 6:28 a.m. No.11169017   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11168966

Abraham still sinned by sacrificing blood to God, but better the blood of a sheep for him and his son to enjoy as BBQ, than killing and eating his son. Work out the reasoning. Was it ever okay to kill and eat babies? Did their culture still expect blood sacrifices though? Did they do it with humans for a long long time anyway, as they do still?

 

What did the priests eat who served in the various temples?

The offerings.

 

If we accept that Jesus died to prove that no more blood needed to be shed, for the sake of some magical being and the idea of "original sin". If blood is to be shed it should serve the good of mankind, and not the god of waste and slaughter and destruction.

Anonymous ID: ec69c7 Oct. 20, 2020, 7:02 a.m. No.11169320   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9615

>>11169245

Don't forget. There's always the scuttlebutt that dear father had mommy and sister killed and tried to have him and the favorite son taken out too so that Daddy could run off with Gilly.

 

How long did he have to wait for revenge?

Anonymous ID: ec69c7 Oct. 20, 2020, 7:09 a.m. No.11169380   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9385

>>11169352

He needs a hug, a handshake and some careful treatment. None of us know him or the truth, just what the MSM has allowed to be told. If there's a way for him to get redemption, I hope he gets it.