You seem to have misunderstood the sauce-thing.
Anon who post a theory should provide sauce for that theory. (=you)
If anons reject your theory you are not in a position to ask for sauce for the rejection until you yourself provide sauce for your initial theory.
Understand?
Your interpretation of a book does not qualify as source. If you think it does, you have to make some kind of graphic to make it easily understood. Nobody is going to read a whole book because someone on qresearch claim it will make them reach your specific conclusion.
You asking for sauce from me? For what exactly?
> i'm better than you so you should conform to my will and my way of thinking.
Fuck off with your self-aggrandizing bullshit. Maybe I have already read that book and still have another opinion? Go figure.
In case anons are interested in farming memes together and identifying the best targets please do take a look at this >>11163069 (pb)
I can't do it alone, but if a few dozen anons participated it could work and help digital-warriors on twatter and FB to collect ammo efficiently.
What part of maybe do you not understand?
Still, nobody is going to do your job for you and go through books just to see if your idea checks out.
Make it quick and easy to see clearly or be prepared to keep having these discussions every time you post your spam.
You are clearly a newfag, we've all been there, but please, lurk a bit moar to understad that you nobody will listen to you without good sauce, keep posting the same stuff over and over is what shills do.
You don't wanna be a shill, do you?
Ok, keep your position that you are better than everybody here so you can tell us what to do. That'll really work out for ya, as it has so far, kek. Just tried to be nice to explain how shit works around here, but I guess you want to learn the hard way, fine, it's your choice and thus probably what you need to experience.