>>11172883

>constitutional amendment

>passing in this congress

Serious doubts about your post

But it is 2020 and Trump as kind of hinted something along those terms

I rate it as plausible BUT very very VERY unlikely as being true

>>11173032

One bread

loudest assholes get the filter

all you are doing is trying to piss anons off and stop research and discussion

fake baker war is over

This “comped” baker you are screeching about is asking for a handoff, but instead of volunteering or updating your shit script you just keep on screeching

fuck you you piece of shit try again next bread

>>11173245

bet it really pisses you off that you can’t crack the passcode

>>11173352

i thought the same

we still need to see evidence either way for who to blame

Personally i’m leaning towards the biden’s because it was blatant selling access and we have the emails showing they were willing to manipulate american foreign policy to enrich themselves.

Clinton sold access absolutely, I just don’t know if it was her that did that. She’s still an evil cunt regardless

>>11173388

Interesting

Then Nancy Pelosi becomes interim president

This COULD be a plan

Still it would require the electors to vote for biden based on voting across the US.

>>11173409

We are winning in mail in ballots

update your script bot