uhh
so much for standing down?
so, were not going to followanyhandoff procedures, then?
>Yeah, BO is retarded and dislikes me
such is life
the morning will bring a new dawn
and the promise of a new day
always darkest before theDon
disagree
>says who?
thanks bakes!
if handoff matter -at all-
than this is the legit bread
if handoff do NOT matter at all
then let the chaos rise
so you actually dont care about handoff procedures, then
"she" was legitimetly confirmed by OP baker on duty last bread
but you dont care about that, do you?
>She was confirmed but didn't bake
ohh really
she postedDoughlink
check the UID
reconcile
yeah, BO locked it
so she baked another one
she isstillthe legitimate baker on duty
>she isstillthe legitimate baker on duty
that is
if
handoff procedure actually means anything to anyone
are you fucking high, anon?
current baker of this bread hands of with random UserID that is NOT OP baker in last bread
>>11185770
>610036
>Handoff Confirmed
>>11185785
>64d647
>Handoff confirmed.
>Godspeed baker.
anon cheks'm
you do realize baker on duty already handed off, right?
>>11185159 OP baker
>ddd8e8
>Kitchen is offered up
>DOUGH
>>11185248 FIRST anon to offer
>75e4e0
>new baker here can bake
>>11185276 OP baker
>ddd8e8
>Sure you want to bake this one?
>Handoff Confirmed
^do you see that right there? thats called aconfirmedhandoff^
current confirmed baker on duty is UID: 75e4e0
please explain again how this was a "hidden" handoff
reconcile
or it is confirmed that you do not care -at all- about handoff precedures
>Make them usered textand bold so anons can see what is going on.
>red-text
>>11185276 (PB)
>>11185276 (PB)
>>11185276 (PB)
what do you call that?
>Not a legit handoff
okay "anon"
yeah yeah
just head on over to /comms/ so you can learn how to ==really= bake
kek
>Not a legit handoff, was done BENEATH THE SHEETS
>red text Handoff Confirmed
>Handoffs need to be TAGGED TO THE DOUGH, especially late at night.
e-baker never tagged the dough (PB)
>filtered
confirmed
/comms/bakers dont care about handoff procedures
will not repsect legitimate anon handoff
its almost like that is what cause all of this in the first place
I hereby make a claim of /comms/baker subversion
this claim is the foundational reason for the splitting of the bread saturday 10/3
the bread was split for the reason of:
Violation of First Principles
First Principle Violated:
-anons not allowed to bake as anon
Example 1 of Ongoing Issue
/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons
4 /comms/bakers involved in this example (4 unique UID's)
pic related includes 3 of these bakers
would have included 4th but pic related getting too large to digest
Bread #13946
/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons
anon wasfirst to offerto take bake
/comms/baker 'be' refuses to pass without qbin pre-verification
/comms/bakers proceed to defend brand new baker hand-off pre-verification procedure that was created by these same /comms/bakers
/comms/bakers require anon to selfdox/namefag in order to bake
since when are anons not allowed to bake as anon?
pic very related
input from anons requested
how does this look to you anons?
easy to understand?
is everything sauced?
UIDs → /comms/baker ID's
too big? (what should be removed?)
At least 2 more examples of the above are being sauced and proofed
will post when done
thank you for (you)r consideration
o7
>and "confirmed baker" did not bake
right
right
right
just any reality you want it to be, huh?
this
and in one unanimous voice
every single anon shouted:
/qresearch/ is NOT "Jew" research
we do NOT research Jews here
only gentiles
>in REAL TIME
so
your argument
is that the handoff happened
infaketime?
like, Julian calendar?
>what the hell is "bbread" supposed to mean?
baker on duty posts red-text bread link at the very end of the bread
I dunno, anon
what the fuck do YOU think thats for?
>4. what instructions are all the bakers under?
go to /comms/
receive one size fits all baking instructions
bake like a kike
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
so THATS why /comms/ insists on hijacking the dough from confirmed baker on duty
got it
>self-confirm so nobody else bakes?
as if that matters to -anyone-
notice your theonly"anon" who has made -any- statements about what handoff procedures should be?
I am merely pointing out the absolute dishonor of declaring baker handoff's sacred
and then completely ignoring legitimate anon handoffs
I dont give a fuck about handoff's
but
(you) claim that you do
if youdid
you would not support what is happeneing right now
instead you continue to create new idiosyncrasies to defend the hijacking of the legit baker on duty
andyou are telling anons to head on over to /comms/ to learn how to "really" bake
interesting
interesting indeed
for one
>I asked baker to self-confirm.
and if baker does not self-confirm?
what does that mean?
baker on duty inunconfirmed?
if only we had aconfirmedbaker
…somehwere…
>is that CLEAR ENOUGH for you??
no
its really not
because animebaker DID get a handoff
current e-baker did NOT
and has NOT self-confirmed
and yet here we are
so it looks like those handoff procedures are worth fuck-all
>if anons do not use the procedures then they are indeed WORTHLESS
thank you anon
on this
we agree
that actually feels good
o7