>>1118655

Let's do this thang! Not enough popcorn in the world for this...

Pleast, Q, POTUS, beat the clock; you'll be taking untold amounts of money from paid shills if you do:

https:// www.predictit.org/Contract/8408/Will-a-federal-criminal-charge-against-Hillary-Clinton-be-confirmed-by-June-30%2c-2018#data

They abound in the "Disqus" section near the bottom of the page, and are probably paid for responses and who knows who it is besides they themselves who drive down the price of the "Yes" shares

>>1119232

This

>>1119229

Also, it would be easy money for anons if they were to get in on this, 90%+ potential return! I'd do it myself except for my ignorance of the tax laws involved in such a thing, but this is basically penny stocks on predicting events; election night was epic on that site!

>>1119395

This

>>1119493

One has an R: Rotham?