>>11187868 (PB)

>your attempts to stop someone from doing it is tyrannical. You must be from the kitchen, how organic.

Just passing through, but he asked a 'Why" question. I don't see how that is a "tyrannical" "attempt to stop someone"

I'm seeing you accusing him of something he didn't say - putting your words in his mouth - (strawman argument) and throwing in insult and personal attack (ad hominem.)

At what point are logical fallacies better just called LIES?

>>11188026

tyb - jus passin thru on muh way to another nap, but want to mention my unverified observation that the globalis liars seem to crave for control mos at primetimes - dinnertime/evening, maybe lunchtimes.

Maybe night-graveyd could be called patriot anon primetime.

Cud be wrong.

Hittin the sack. o7