dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

More Than Half of Trump Supporters Believe QAnon Conspiracy

Theories Now

Including that Democrats are involved in "elite child sex-trafficking rings."

By David Gilbert

October 21, 2020, 11:35am

Half of President Donald Trump’s supporters think that Democrats are involved in “elite child sex-trafficking rings,” a core belief of the QAnon conspiracy theory.

Another 33% of Trumpers aren’t sure, and just 17% dismiss the baseless theory completely.

These are the findings of a new YouGov/Yahoo News poll, which was conducted after Trump refused to denounce QAnon during his NBC-hosted town hall last week. The conspiracy theory, which began on fringe websites in 2017, has gotten mainstream amplification in recent months via social media and dozens of Republican congressional candidates who openly support the movement.

A similar number of Trump supporters (52%) believe—as QAnon followers do—that the president is working to dismantle the sex-trafficking ring, with 37% unsure and just 11% dismissing the theory.

But perhaps the most telling statistic from the survey is that just 48% of Trump supporters have heard about QAnon, meaning that more Trump supporters believe in the core tenets of the conspiracy than have heard about it.

This startling stat speaks to the group’s success in spreading a so-called lighter version of QAnon during the pandemic, particularly targeting women on Facebook and Instagram.

The revelation is reinforced by the fact that of the Trump supporters who have heard of QAnon, just one in six (15%) think it’s true while nearly half (47%) of the Trump supporters who’ve heard of the conspiracy theory just aren’t sure what to make of it.

These QAnon-lite campaigns have been sparked in part because of efforts by social media platforms to claim down on QAnon and related hashtags. Last month, Q, the supposed anonymous leader of the group, posted a message telling followers to “deploy camouflage” by not mentioning QAnon directly in order to avoid social media bans.

Trump, who has retweeted Twitter accounts of QAnon followers over 250 times, was given a chance to disavow the group during the town hall event last week.

Instead, he claimed to “know nothing about QAnon” except that “they are very strongly against pedophilia, and I agree with that.”

The survey found that three-quarters (74%) of his supporters thought this response was appropriate, while only 5% thought it was inappropriate.

Overall, 55% of registered voters said they have heard of QAnon, though supporters of Democratic nominee Joe Biden (69%) are more likely than Trump supporters (48%) to have heard of the conspiracy theory.

But while half of Trump’s supporters believed the claims made by QAnon supporters, the vast majority (82%) of Biden’s supporters don’t believe the conspiracy.

Link/source/sauce:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7aqza/more-than-half-of-trump-supporters-believe-qanon-conspiracy-theories-now

Vatican Secret deal with China as China attacks the world?

Benedict started this process btw.

Chinese diplomats mum on renewing Vatican accord

October 21, 2020

CWN Editor's Note: While Vatican officials have expressed confidence that an agreement with Beijing will be extended, an expert on the Church in China notes that Chinese officials have remained silent on the matter. Father Bernardo Cervellera, the head of the AsiaNews service, questions whether some issues are still being debated—whether Beijing is quietly pushing for the Vatican to break off diplomatic ties with Taiwan, while the Vatican wants Beijing to recognize the status of bishops in the “underground” Church.

SOURCE:

https://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=48375

>>11190710

10/21/2020, 12.47CHINA - VATICAN

China still silent on Vatican agreement:

‘Like a shame and ineffable hope'

by Bernardo Cervellera

Unofficial voices (from the Vatican side) say that the renewal of the agreement will be signed tomorrow. But a wall of silence remains from China, or quotations from the Vatican only. The hypothesis is that the dialogue with China has reached an impasse: China wants the Holy See to break relations with Taiwan and the Vatican wants the recognition of unofficial bishops. The second elegy of Rainer Maria Rilke.

Rome (AsiaNews) - For weeks now we have been asking various Chinese personalities to tell us something about the Sino-Vatican agreement, if it is being debated among members of the Party, if the newspapers mention it. The only answer we are greeted with is silence: everything is silent, nobody will mention it, it is as if it were a state secret at the highest levels.

The provisional agreement signed between China and the Vatican on 22 September 2018, valid for two years, has already expired. But as Card. Parolin pointed out, as it was implemented from 22 October, its deadline is delayed by one month, until tomorrow.

Last October 18, in an article by Massimo Franco in "Corriere della Sera", an anonymous Vatican figure confirmed "without further caution" that the agreement will be renewed tomorrow, with "simultaneous" communication at noon from the Vatican, at 18 in Beijing.

It is strange enough that such an important step from the point of view of Vatican diplomacy and for the evangelization of China should be thus announced, anonymously and moreover in a secular newspaper. But what is even stranger is that the "Global Times", the magazine of the "People's Daily", the official tool of the Chinese Communist Party, cites the Corriere della Sera and that article to confirm "the strong and healthy relationship between the two countries [ China and Vatican] for the appointment of bishops ".

But it says nothing about the renewal of the agreement. The Global Times itself admits that "no official announcement was made, and the Holy See press office did not respond to the request of the Global Times". In any case - the article continues - the "observers" are "sure about the renewal" of the agreement.

The point is that all these "observers" cited are on the Vatican side, there is not even one Chinese political personality among them! Antonio Spadaro is however cited, who states that " there is no reason to think that the agreement should be renewed in an uneventful way".

And once again the official bishop of Mindong, the ex-excommunicated Vincenzo Zhan Silu, is quoted as saying that "the renewal of the agreement would send the Chinese Catholic Church a clear signal that the Vatican is pursuing a healthy development in China".

The question that arises is this: why for such an important step do we prefer anonymous communication (from the Vatican) and non-communication from China?

We posed this same question to various Chinese Catholic personalities, whose answers can be summarized in the following considerations:

China is worried about other problems (Covid, US elections, poor economy, forthcoming Party Plenum, …) and the provisional agreement seems to be a very minor thing to give it due attention.

Beijing keeps the Vatican on the side-lines to increase pressure on the Vatican and gain concessions. According to various experts, the fundamental reason why China is involved in the dialogue with the Vatican is the possibility of diplomatic relations, which imply the breakdown of diplomatic relations with Taiwan, which would thus lose the only European country that recognizes the Republic of China. But the Vatican holds back on the Taiwan card to the end, to ask China for greater religious freedom.

The Vatican wants unofficial bishops to be recognized with the renewal of the agreement, even if they do not sign up for membership in the "independent Church", which is what the Ministry of Religious Affairs wants. It is no coincidence that in recent weeks many unofficial bishops, not recognized by the government, have been captured and isolated for days and weeks (among them Mgr Giulio Jia Zhiguo of Zhengding; Mgr Pietro Shao Zhumin of Wenzhou; Mgr Guo Xijin of Mindong; ….) for talks with the authorities.

Either way, this mode of conducting the question is quite surprising: no personality is revealed, yet everyone says that there will be a renewal of the agreement. A verse by Rainer Maria Rilke comes to mind in the second of the "Duino Elegies": "Everything conspires to silence us, kind of like a silent shame, perhaps, a bit like a silent ineffable hope".

Link:

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/China-still-silent-on-Vatican-agreement:-Like-a-shame-and-ineffable-hope'-51367.html

>>11190710

>>11190717

^^^^^^^^^^^

>>11190687

Baker,

I believe these two articles from today relate to drop #4799.

Q DROP #4799

!!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 376386 No.10864489

Sep 30 2020 22:52:42 (EST) NEW

Anonymous ID: 39774c No.10864305

Sep 30 2020 22:43:23 (EST) NEW

09302020nyt1.png⬇

Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns

With Pope’s Critics

Pope Francis declined to see Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is demanding a harder Vatican line on China. The Holy See said meeting just before a U.S. election would be inappropriate.

By Jason Horowitz and Lara Jakes

Sept. 30, 2020, 7:26 p.m. ET

ROME — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently published a sharp letter excoriating the Vatican’s plans to renew an agreement with the Chinese government on Church operations in China.

He promoted the article in a tweet, concluding, “The Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.”

An indignant Vatican took the article more as a calculated affront than a diplomatic gesture. The friction broke into the open on Wednesday as Mr. Pompeo arrived in Rome and met with prelates

and others who are hostile to Pope Francis, while the Vatican denied him a meeting with the pontiff and rebuffed his efforts to derail the deal with China.

“Pompeo asked to meet” the pope, who turned him down because Francis had “clearly said that he does not receive political figures ahead of the elections,” Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who,

as secretary of state, is the Vatican’s second-ranking official, told reporters.

But to some observers on both sides of the tensions between the Roman Catholic Church and the Trump administration, Mr. Pompeo’s visit is as much about the coming presidential election as

about China policy. Mr. Pompeo dismissed that suggestion as absurd, but intended or not, his trip signals that President Trump is on the side of those conservative American Catholics who worry

about the church’s direction under Francis and think he is soft on China.

Francis and Mr. Trump, who have exchanged sharp words in the past, present starkly different visions on issues ranging from the environment to immigration to the threat of populism.

In appealing to the Vatican’s support for religious freedom as a reason to drop its China agreement, Mr. Pompeo seemed to seek common ground, but in a way that upset the pope’s chief

allies and delighted his chief critics.

Cardinal Parolin said Mr. Pompeo’s article had caused “surprise” at the Vatican, because this visit to Rome by the secretary and the meetings with high officials at the Holy See had already

been in the works and would have been a “more opportune” forum for airing grievances. He added that Mr. Pompeo’s choice to publish in First Things, a conservative Christian magazine that has

called Francis a failure as Pope, also mattered.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/pompeo-pope-francis-china.html

>>10864305

When does a Church become a playground?

When does a Church become a business?

When does a Church become political?

When does a Church become corrupt?

When does a Church become willfully blind?

When does a Church become controlled?

Q

>>11190727

I believe drop #189 deals with what Q means by "GODFATHER".

Is Fauci in a Papal Order? Is Fauci a Jesuit?

Q DROP #189

The Cult Runs the World

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 21 Nov 2017 - 11:52:02 PM

Identify symbolism (Owl / Y).

Which performers/celebs supported HRC during the election?

Who performed during her rallies?

What jewelry and/or tattoos present?

What other events do they attend together?

What does HRC represent to them?

What celebrities have owl / Y head symbols?

What politicians have owl / Y head symbols?

What powerful people have owl / Y head symbols?

What powerful groups have owl / Y head symbols?

Why are they worn/shown openly?

Their need for symbolism will be their downfall.

MSM role?

Push conspiracy theory.

Social media role?

Push conspiracy theory and institute new rules allowing for ban.

Censorship.

The graphic is key.

Re-read graphic (ex: what family did Soros replace (Y)).

Part II – How were they ‘adopted’ into the cult (as children).

What were they provided for obeying and staying silent (brainwashed)?

All that you know to be right is wrong.

The ‘cult’ runs the world.

Fantasy land.

The world is fighting back (& destroying the cult).

20% public.

80% private.

The world would otherwise collapse.

40,000ft. v. (again) and need to decrease altitude to avoid ‘conspiracy’ label.

Was necessary.

GODFATHER III.

For God & Country.

Q

Why did Q write GODFATHER III in all caps?

What was revealed in GODFATHER III?

What was REALLY revealed in GODFATHER III?

>>11190642

They have nurtured if not directly spawned communism, socialism and fascism in their pursuit of world domination, I mean, saving the world from hell…..

Most anons cannot even fathom the level of Evil.

Q DROP #3565

Q Links to Pope's Tweet on Human Trafficking

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 30 Jul 2019 - 8:23:13 PM

https://twitter.com/Pontifex/status/1156165039545606144

Godfather III

It's going to be BIBLICAL.

Q