You seem to think we should only have two choices in every matter?
Q referred to thinks like chess. Chess isn't a 'do this or that', it's a multi-dimensional strategy involving lots of complex solutions to complex problems.
Demanding conformism is the same crime media, politics, etc commits. There's always more than two choices.
"don`t discuss dichotomies"
Except that's the problem. And avoiding it or using a false sense of urgency to suppress open discussion is what leads to boneheaded defeats.
If your house is so badly secured a rapist got in and you were forced to point a gun at them, then it's a result of a systematic failure of options prior to the break-in (why were they free? Why was the house in-secure? Why did no alarms go off prior to break-in? Why is the house in an area with such rampant criminal activity?).
You're honestly wanting to bomb a country because some previous administration signed a (possibly) bad trade deal?
Why's everything got to involve high yield explosives and foreign countries?
Your problems are within your own damn government!
In other news (the real reason I dropped by)…
Check out the keyword list of the NSA… back in 2013, of which I quote a section (look who is in it):
"Daisy, Egret, Iris, Hollyhock, Jasmine, Juile, Vinnell, B.D.M.,Sphinx, Stephanie, Reflection, Spoke, Talent, Trump, FX, FXR, IMF, POCSAG, Covert Video, Intiso, r00t, lock picking, Beyond Hope,"
"Trump"
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/6/20/1217627/-How-To-Make-The-NSA-Think-You-re-A-Terrorist
Left-leaning outlet. 2013.
"Trump"
Part of the NSA keyword search more than 5 years ago.
If that isn't damning proof of Trump's claims (independent, might I add, and prior to even the presidential run) of the NSA being used to keep tabs, I don't know what is.
I would argue he's military, if not NSA then IDF. Not that's necessarily a bad thing - it's down to character.
If he's the kind of military guy who is cleaning house on corruption (the Trump insurance comment by the FBI agents reeks of Hoover's blackbook tactics on presidents), then I'm fine with that.
But if this is another president who is still bombing the same middle-east the last three or so presidents did (even 'lets close Guantanamo bay and leave Iraq' Obama), then I call bull.
Regardless, even if Q is psyops, we shouldn't kill the positive vibe people have going to expose corruption and do the right thing.
Same movement, same goals for exposing corruption, minus a globalist warmongerer in charge.
I think people should apply filters in the interim - only assist on projects they would work on anyway.
The undemocratic Syrian attack has me soured. Last time I checked, Syria didn't even control or influence the US government.