Anonymous ID: 3f10e8 Oct. 21, 2020, 1:09 p.m. No.11194844   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4885 >>5062

>>11194628

>>11194514

If lightening strikes while you’re shillin’ it up, shittin up breads, namefagging, glowniggering, being a complete douche nozzle, the next post you make would be claiming God chose you to be all the above and moar.

 

Go with God hoe, suck your dick on your own time.

 

Breads are for working Anons, not pedoshillapologists Toobin onto themselves.

Anonymous ID: 3f10e8 Oct. 21, 2020, 1:24 p.m. No.11195071   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5082 >>5395

>>11194958

What IS the procedure for investigators to keep and store tech with CP on it, or pictures, VHS, and all other media types; all considered "evidence"? What sort of legal protections are extended to those, like Chanel, who are serving the public interest by pressuring the FBI to do something? I'm sure there are some.

 

Sharing and possessing CP is always illegal. Informants are given immunity for their work. A similar process is undertaken here.